RE: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate
"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Mon, 01 July 2013 16:48 UTC
Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7FC11E8112 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 09:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.459
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.459 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.140, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DdRPtSlNyUiZ for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 09:48:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blv-mbsout-02.boeing.com (blv-mbsout-02.boeing.com [130.76.32.232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0B311E8143 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 09:48:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blv-mbsout-02.boeing.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by blv-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id r61Gm5JZ021317 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 09:48:05 -0700
Received: from XCH-NWHT-09.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-09.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.25.115]) by blv-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id r61Gm3Wr021265 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK); Mon, 1 Jul 2013 09:48:04 -0700
Received: from XCH-EXCO-103.nw.nos.boeing.com (130.247.25.37) by XCH-NWHT-09.nw.nos.boeing.com (130.247.25.115) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.297.1; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 09:48:04 -0700
Received: from XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com ([169.254.4.48]) by XCH-EXCO-103.nw.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::7434:66d:a0ba:2234%15]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.011; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 09:48:03 -0700
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: "sthaug@nethelp.no" <sthaug@nethelp.no>
Subject: RE: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate
Thread-Topic: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate
Thread-Index: AQHOdnhxUZaGJnzSMU6ZOUB9nA7EbJlQBFpw
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:48:02 +0000
Message-ID: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983180B1AC9@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983180B0221@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <520FB317-19E8-4DCA-81FB-124B17732FE0@employees.org> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983180B19B9@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <20130701.183132.78726456.sthaug@nethelp.no>
In-Reply-To: <20130701.183132.78726456.sthaug@nethelp.no>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.247.104.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:48:20 -0000
Hi Steinar, > -----Original Message----- > From: sthaug@nethelp.no [mailto:sthaug@nethelp.no] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 9:32 AM > To: Templin, Fred L > Cc: otroan@employees.org; ipv6@ietf.org > Subject: Re: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate > > > > as far as I can see the setting IPv6 minimum MTU to 1280, which > gives > > > ample room for > > > nested tunnels works as designed. > > > > But, what would that look like in real life? The first tunnel > > (T1) would have to set a 1280 MTU so that its tunneled packets > > would emerge as 1320 bytes. Then, the next tunnel (T2) would > > have to set a 1320 MTU so its tunneled packets would emerge as > > 1360. Then the next tunnel (T3) would have to set a 1360 MTU > > so that its tunneled packets would emerge as 1400, etc. until > > we run out of available MTU. The question is, how can those > > tunnels be so carefully coordinated so that the nesting is > > nailed down enough so that we will never have an MTU infraction? > > I strongly disagree that we should make provisions for umpteen levels > of tunneling. In my network, native IPv6 with no tunnels is clearly > the goal. Anything more than one level of tunneling is a *failure*. Tunnels within tunnels are a fact of life in real networks today. Tunnels are used for many things other than transition, including security, mobility, routing control, etc. and deployment of IPv6 would sustain rather than reverse that trend. Plus, it is not just about tunnels within tunnels but also native links that configure a small MTU. Back to tunnels within tunnels, there are *many* examples that would prove my point but I will give just one. A mobile node configures a 1280 MTU tunnel to a "home agent" and keeps the tunnel alive as it moves around. A second mobile node comes onto the link provided by the first mobile, and also configures a 1280 MTU tunnel. The second mobile node emits a 1280 packet which (when tunneled) becomes 1320. The first mobile node drops the packet and returns "Packet Too Big". In response, the second mobile has two choices: 1) fragment, or 2) shut down the tunnel. > I run my IPv6 customer links with MTU 1500. Good, but I would like to see you push that to 8KB. > > > the vendor I'm most familiar with does not do this in hardware. > sure, > > > you can get reassembly, but at an order of one or two magnitudes > less. > > > if anyone know of platforms doing IPv6 fragment reassembly at line > rate > > > for 10G or 100G interfaces I'll stand corrected. ;-) > > > for now reassembly in the network is not realistic. > > > > Reassembly is required by RFC2460, RFC2473 and I think others > > have also been mentioned. To support tunnels, and especially > > tunnels within tunnels, it needs to be there. > > Reassembly is required by end systems, which typically don't run at > 100G. Reassembly is also required by any node that configures an RFC2473 egress tunnel endpoint. > If I were to vote with my wallet, reassembly at 100G and similar line > rates is *way* down on my requirements list. Two things about this is that 1) the location of the tunnel egress should be carefully selected, and 2) the SEAL tunnel egress can use RFC4821-style probing to tune out fragmentation when the path supports a sufficiently large MTU. SEAL is not about steady-state, use-all-the-time fragmentation; it is about doing what needs to be done while being as efficient as possible. > Requiring L4 info in the first fragment SEAL does that. > (*and* in each subsequent fragment) SEAL doesn't do that unless some new IPv6 extension header was defined. Then, SEAL would use the extension header the same as any other IPv6 protocol. > is far more important. Good; let's make it happen. Thanks - Fred fred.l.templin@boeing.com > Steinar Haug, AS 2116
- Re: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate sthaug
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Carsten Bormann
- RE: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Templin, Fred L
- FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Ronald Bonica
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Arturo Servin
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Mark Smith
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Simon Perreault
- RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Ronald Bonica
- Re: RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bo… Ray Hunter
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… joel jaeggli
- RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Ronald Bonica
- RE: RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bo… Ronald Bonica
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Ray Hunter
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Fred Baker (fred)
- RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Ronald Bonica
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Ronald Bonica
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Tore Anderson
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Mark Andrews
- RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Templin, Fred L
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Glen Turner
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… George Michaelson
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Mark Andrews
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Sheng Jiang
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Doug Barton
- RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Liubing (Leo)
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Mark Andrews
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Tore Anderson
- RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Ronald Bonica
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Ronald Bonica
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Ronald Bonica
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Ole Troan
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Templin, Fred L
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Marc Lampo
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Mark Smith
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Hagen Paul Pfeifer
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Hagen Paul Pfeifer
- RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Ronald Bonica
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… james woodyatt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… joel jaeggli
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… james woodyatt
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Sheng Jiang
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… George Michaelson
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Mark Andrews
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… joel jaeggli
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Ronald Bonica
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Randy Bush
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… joel jaeggli
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Mark Andrews
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… George Michaelson
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Geoff Huston
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Mark Andrews
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Mark Andrews
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Bob Hinden
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Glen Turner
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Geoff Huston
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Tore Anderson
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… John Leslie
- RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Templin, Fred L
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Christian Huitema
- Re: [6MAN] New Version Notification for draft-bon… Warren Kumari
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Ole Troan
- Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica… Brian Jones
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Randy Bush
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Ole Troan
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Randy Bush
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Tony Hain
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Mark Andrews
- RE: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Templin, Fred L
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… james woodyatt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Randy Bush
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Mark Andrews
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… George Michaelson
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Mark Andrews
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Kevin Lahey
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Tony Hain
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Mark Andrews
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Sheng Jiang
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Randy Bush
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Hagen Paul Pfeifer
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Mark Andrews
- Re: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Hagen Paul Pfeifer
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Fernando Gont
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… james woodyatt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Mark Andrews
- draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Brian E Carpenter
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Randy Bush
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Fernando Gont
- Re: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Marc Lampo
- RE: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Templin, Fred L
- Re: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Antonios Atlasis
- RE: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Templin, Fred L
- Re: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Antonios Atlasis
- RE: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Tony Hain
- Re: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Mark Andrews
- Re: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Karl Auer
- RE: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Templin, Fred L
- Re: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Ole Troan
- Re: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Mark Andrews
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Erik Nygren
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Templin, Fred L
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… james woodyatt
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Templin, Fred L
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… james woodyatt
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Templin, Fred L
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Templin, Fred L
- Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragmentat… Fernando Gont
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Templin, Fred L
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Templin, Fred L
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Templin, Fred L
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Hannes Frederic Sowa
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Templin, Fred L
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Doug Barton
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Antonios Atlasis
- Re: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Ole Troan
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… C. M. Heard
- RE: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate Templin, Fred L
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Templin, Fred L
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6ma… Templin, Fred L
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Francis Dupont
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Marc Lampo
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Fernando Gont
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Fernando Gont
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Manfredi, Albert E
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Mark Andrews
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… RJ Atkinson
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Randy Bush
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Brian Jones
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… RJ Atkinson
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Doug Barton
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Ronald Bonica
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Doug Barton
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Carsten Bormann
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Templin, Fred L
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Ronald Bonica
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… RJ Atkinson
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Templin, Fred L
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Templin, Fred L
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Ronald Bonica
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Templin, Fred L
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Ronald Bonica
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Templin, Fred L
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… james woodyatt
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Ronald Bonica
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Templin, Fred L
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Templin, Fred L
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Templin, Fred L
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… james woodyatt
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Ronald Bonica
- RE: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Templin, Fred L
- Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragme… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: "Deprecate" Templin, Fred L
- Re: "Deprecate" Mark Andrews
- Re: "Deprecate" Francis Dupont
- Re: "Deprecate" RJ Atkinson
- Re: "Deprecate" RJ Atkinson
- RE: "Deprecate" Templin, Fred L
- RE: "Deprecate" Templin, Fred L
- RE: "Deprecate" Templin, Fred L
- RE: "Deprecate" Templin, Fred L
- RE: "Deprecate" C. M. Heard