IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Mon, 24 June 2013 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2929B21E810E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.081
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.081 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.345, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_BLANKS=0.041, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ynWDOUhqDpQI for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co9ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [207.46.163.27]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49ABB21E80FD for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail125-co9-R.bigfish.com (10.236.132.225) by CO9EHSOBE019.bigfish.com (10.236.130.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:48:38 +0000
Received: from mail125-co9 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail125-co9-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777602E0831 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:48:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:66.129.224.53; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -1
X-BigFish: PS-1(zz1432Izz1f42h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzzz2fh2a8h683h839h93fhd25hf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail125-co9: domain of juniper.net designates 66.129.224.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.129.224.53; envelope-from=rbonica@juniper.net; helo=P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ; -HQ.jnpr.net ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:157.56.238.5; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:BY2PRD0512HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT
Received: from mail125-co9 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail125-co9 (MessageSwitch) id 1372085317164391_26232; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:48:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO9EHSMHS007.bigfish.com (unknown [10.236.132.239]) by mail125-co9.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D034000BC for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:48:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (66.129.224.53) by CO9EHSMHS007.bigfish.com (10.236.130.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:48:33 +0000
Received: from P-CLDFE02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.60) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:48:31 -0700
Received: from o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.224) by o365mail.juniper.net (172.24.192.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.355.2; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:48:30 -0700
Received: from DB8EHSOBE017.bigfish.com (213.199.154.185) by o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.224) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 08:00:25 -0700
Received: from mail154-db8-R.bigfish.com (10.174.8.225) by DB8EHSOBE017.bigfish.com (10.174.4.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:48:27 +0000
Received: from mail154-db8 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail154-db8-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2A0800E9 for <ipv6@ietf.org.FOPE.CONNECTOR.OVERRIDE>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:48:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail154-db8 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail154-db8 (MessageSwitch) id 1372085306152964_17527; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:48:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB8EHSMHS020.bigfish.com (unknown [10.174.8.248]) by mail154-db8.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155834E004A; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:48:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BY2PRD0512HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.238.5) by DB8EHSMHS020.bigfish.com (10.174.4.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:48:23 +0000
Received: from BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.5.17]) by BY2PRD0512HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.243.36]) with mapi id 14.16.0324.000; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:48:14 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHObrhqoPSgCrUHwECtndDXiOVBOJlEG04AgADagvA=
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:48:14 +0000
Message-ID: <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F86EB0@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85151@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C408BC.4030909@forthnetgroup.gr> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85BCB@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B921F57@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923ACA4B26@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923ACA4B26@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.232.2]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%HUAWEI.COM$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%CISCO.COM$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org 6man-wg" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:48:46 -0000

> 
> +1. For me, this draft looks dangerous by proposing to deprecate
> fragmentation with only one-side observation. This draft does not give
> enough analysis on these existing fragmentation use cases, particularly
> these use cases the fragments within a single domain.
> 
> On other side , only disallowing fragmentation to be used among domains
> may helpful to reduce the operational complex.
> 

Sheng,

I hear you. The next version of the draft will include a discussion of SIIT, OSPFv3 and tunneling in general.

(This should address your comments, as well as those of Tore, Fred and Fred.)


                                  Ron

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email