RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt

Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com> Tue, 25 June 2013 00:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2ACB21F9EB4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 17:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0bmy-C-i-ZOr for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 17:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8EA21F9DED for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 17:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AUI57706; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:49:15 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:48:35 +0100
Received: from NKGEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.37) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:49:13 +0100
Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.3]) by nkgeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.37]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 08:49:07 +0800
From: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
To: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org>
Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHObrh5oVnOfg0y+kmEyboR2MaX65lEGBeQgABYEQCAASrQgA==
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:49:07 +0000
Message-ID: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923ACA52AE@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85151@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C408BC.4030909@forthnetgroup.gr> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85BCB@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B921F57@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923ACA4B26@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F86EB0@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F86EB0@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-cr-hashedpuzzle: AdS/ FwA0 K06z Leew LypU OIC9 QT2Y TvRj TwIx WKUz WWth YLGY auzm avRA bV8j nJ5u; 4; ZgByAGUAZABAAGMAaQBzAGMAbwAuAGMAbwBtADsAaQBwAHYANgBAAGkAZQB0AGYALgBvAHIAZwA7AG8AdAByAG8AYQBuAEAAZQBtAHAAbABvAHkAZQBlAHMALgBvAHIAZwA7AHIAYgBvAG4AaQBjAGEAQABqAHUAbgBpAHAAZQByAC4AbgBlAHQA; Sosha1_v1; 7; {E92745C9-9095-40F9-91A0-B41C3BB73C87}; agBpAGEAbgBnAHMAaABlAG4AZwBAAGgAdQBhAHcAZQBpAC4AYwBvAG0A; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:48:59 GMT; UgBFADoAIABOAGUAdwAgAFYAZQByAHMAaQBvAG4AIABOAG8AdABpAGYAaQBjAGEAdABpAG8AbgAgAGYAbwByAAkAZAByAGEAZgB0AC0AYgBvAG4AaQBjAGEALQA2AG0AYQBuAC0AZgByAGEAZwAtAGQAZQBwAHIAZQBjAGEAdABlAC0AMAAwAC4AdAB4AHQA
x-cr-puzzleid: {E92745C9-9095-40F9-91A0-B41C3BB73C87}
x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.145]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org 6man-wg" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:49:22 -0000

>> +1. For me, this draft looks dangerous by proposing to deprecate
>> fragmentation with only one-side observation. This draft does not give
>> enough analysis on these existing fragmentation use cases, particularly
>> these use cases the fragments within a single domain.
>>
>> On other side , only disallowing fragmentation to be used among domains
>> may helpful to reduce the operational complex.
>>
>
>Sheng,
>
>I hear you. The next version of the draft will include a discussion of SIIT,
>OSPFv3 and tunneling in general.
>
>(This should address your comments, as well as those of Tore, Fred and Fred.)

Hi, Ron,

Yes, this will address my comments. I agree with Ole that an analysis document would help us to understand the issues and the consequences.

However, I personally think we would found deprecating fragmentation in whole IPv6 protocol might be too dramatic and had too many incompatible issues after carefully and neutral analysis. The deprecating proposal by itself might create more problems than it fixes.

A compromise mechanism that only restrict the usage of fragmentation in certain scenarios may be much less damage.

Best regards,

Sheng

>
>                                  Ron