IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mmox] Creating walled gardens considered harmful

Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com> Sun, 29 March 2009 23:44 UTC

Return-Path: <jwatte@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D873A687D for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:44:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.579
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.579 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nZP1SdW2ne7S for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:44:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.239]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA9A3A67CC for <mmox@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:44:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so1802898rvb.49 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YSBWOxIweskfFfBTJPS1JR2nTcWHvO8ULcZQT014bB4=; b=Ht6+9xoQwXebKkbg/xXwPDoSm6xEsx2toXaSIE5wWJxZ4rDLrgHbnDudwDuqeJmSEm lChr2ii75f32kcI4X0tcaN22Pj66hjCEQAAWnVdqxI3cUrB3dUeYC7hezbuffTA93b25 HdTq03bLyPAggnXjkelkTaGmJAI7IVry5NhBk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WtxeDZQD4r+Ig6KTuGUF9W7dMXpITGJ15l8tvCVaD9HZTxEb4/pcfpTuWfaxazGakJ JYOUMaUXF+nbZQR93mMzlWXf5gHZmBkOtnw01lXNA42tLEQeJ4G0TVDk1BiZ2RG+eRIS fj1irIm5s0rhkd+ac5ysuRpJ5opG+TUAPh5Qs=
Received: by 10.115.110.1 with SMTP id n1mr3156764wam.99.1238370335277; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.1.101? (svn.mindcontrol.org [69.17.45.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j34sm3932860waf.27.2009.03.29.16.45.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <49D0081E.4010007@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:45:34 -0700
From: Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
References: <e0b04bba0903250007k6886383bja0a06884e8081ac7@mail.gmail.com> <49CBC087.9070209@gmail.com> <e0b04bba0903262304k6c6cb307qc0ed4b2ae1c3dc60@mail.gmail.com> <49CD061D.30101@gmail.com> <e0b04bba0903272047u738513b9pc2dbe219dbce37e3@mail.gmail.com> <49CDC0BA.5070403@gmail.com> <f0b9e3410903280920o1e436337hb4c40a5b5f124876@mail.gmail.com> <49CE5BDC.5040808@gmail.com> <e0b04bba0903281057g943ce9cjdcce0fc2712a4ec3@mail.gmail.com> <49CF1B1E.4070506@gmail.com> <e0b04bba0903290138ifbfaf18p930f87d1e49e6dbb@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e0b04bba0903290138ifbfaf18p930f87d1e49e6dbb@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: MMOX-IETF <mmox@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mmox] Creating walled gardens considered harmful
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:44:38 -0000

Morgaine wrote:
> There are many parts to the puzzle, but participants need implement 
> only those parts of relevance to them.

I agree. However, that side-steps the problem a little bit. My feedback 
is that we should make the implementation as cheap as possible to get 
some end-user visible benefit for virtual world interoperability, so 
that we can get lots of worlds on board. Agreed?

Sincerely,

jw

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email