Re: [mmox] Creating walled gardens considered harmful

Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com> Thu, 26 March 2009 01:01 UTC

Return-Path: <jwatte@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425463A6832 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NMFBkBDGM-fK for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.225]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6BA28C151 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so2487798rvb.5 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K8S7oXsa6AqvSMlzZytSWJ8TT5/vWguWnYAMasDRqJI=; b=pZrAkHoUbziSWYCeOYhXTTJhSw3ZTmt2fpRq7efsXyn1pFkyCFGLxExYKPn8G8+bFK zLlPMwdbmDxj2khFl4GxwZgzV6uOcU+fJ0ROlcAWyKDeZJ7GAQBZfs6zSlmgxynXp02g Hn6gXD7SXLEq2WLz+ueaBpS7SyN45D1ql8wp8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MLeBgduPmwsOCaqX2Z6dWRQYWD7pTUmj4O5zqjoKGlLJ3KyEzLACzmhvJuAYeGKo+F UxKf4YsGFFoubbwp9RX2FbKXsuNEb6X/kTgLUJLqq9amdb8baGS3kMv//rIlDJSvP4wZ Ldh1azMR80XDIfMEqqCeH+NQEnOwVkhWoMI/s=
Received: by 10.142.177.13 with SMTP id z13mr94636wfe.184.1238029349240; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?68.29.141.86? (68-29-141-86.pools.spcsdns.net [68.29.141.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 30sm1615737wfd.15.2009.03.25.18.02.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <49CAD422.1020000@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:02:26 -0700
From: Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christian Scholz <cs@comlounge.net>
References: <e0b04bba0903250007k6886383bja0a06884e8081ac7@mail.gmail.com> <49CA6728.4080607@gmail.com> <49CAA55C.9030108@comlounge.net>
In-Reply-To: <49CAA55C.9030108@comlounge.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: MMOX-IETF <mmox@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mmox] Creating walled gardens considered harmful
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:01:37 -0000

Christian Scholz wrote:
> That actually was part of my proposal in that we use a service 
> discovery method as a foundation. This can be built using XRDS or 
> similar means, the same thing OpenID already uses and which is planned 
> for OAuth discovery (actually that's XRD but that's not yet published 
> but should be similar).

This gets my vote. It is small enough, de-coupled enough, and technology 
neutral enough to make sense for any vendor/platform/technology, despite 
vast technical implementation differences. It also neatly side-steps the 
need to define more technology specific aspects like a binary 
serialization format.

Sincerely,

jw