Re: [mmox] charter scope, thinking horizontally

Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com> Mon, 30 March 2009 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jwatte@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293F23A6893 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.58
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.58 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6OksJzfQVGn3 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.177]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665CE3A6872 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id l35so1038220waf.5 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZW0BjBt0qQmZB76l4O68Q8Q9Dd1z7vSHKlB+KSTAS3c=; b=Gab0sc/5wpzvqUVpT46ACecDhrxMlnrSdW8fODq7dJTa5JgjDTf05WwGiyq4zhnpdk Y0ZDY45KJzpIR96q7JouzeO4lTPW9S2n8aJ2jgGHZAr6B0+WDuY9SOg0/+qiJzldWg89 xvL1vV+qVhPZg8SSXKtIoRrKGdvxSpfPMMXbU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OrkhbVAEVkA5NuDtgT/8kOhmUZwsQDAf2mX2MBD5lR3119IQctZbxbG4iFb0adjyed zq1k8DjbYy1M3ajmLRWsnA4qBretn+Z5g7lbTAhL4SNHstvDWfRv53OcxECspBuYCNie jLtgExQfGygAfSxbZfsMerGZxM1pzYaFwUV3w=
Received: by 10.115.33.1 with SMTP id l1mr3211433waj.168.1238378246828; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.1.101? (svn.mindcontrol.org [69.17.45.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m6sm4048467wag.49.2009.03.29.18.57.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <49D02705.4070102@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:57:25 -0700
From: Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Charles Krinke <charles.krinke@gmail.com>
References: <e0b04bba0903250007k6886383bja0a06884e8081ac7@mail.gmail.com> <f0b9e3410903280920o1e436337hb4c40a5b5f124876@mail.gmail.com> <49CE5BDC.5040808@gmail.com> <e0b04bba0903281057g943ce9cjdcce0fc2712a4ec3@mail.gmail.com> <49CF1B1E.4070506@gmail.com> <e0b04bba0903290138ifbfaf18p930f87d1e49e6dbb@mail.gmail.com> <1238321627.6757.20.camel@localhost> <8B62A039C620904E92F1233570534C9B0118CD4EE34E@nambx04.corp.adobe.com> <f0b9e3410903291043k3e58e72ci74f333ddb9a2ec88@mail.gmail.com> <49D0092D.3050206@gmail.com> <f0b9e3410903291754m4a1238c6uaf87e74434cb89fd@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f0b9e3410903291754m4a1238c6uaf87e74434cb89fd@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: MMOX-IETF <mmox@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mmox] charter scope, thinking horizontally
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:56:30 -0000

What, if anything, needs to be done if we were to look at XMPP and SIP 
for VW communication interop?

If someone wants to try a SIP session between OLIVE and some other 
virtual world, could you contact me off-list, and perhaps we can just 
try it out and see if it's good enough or not?

Sincerely,

jw


Charles Krinke wrote:
> Matters not. Some folks prefer typing, some prefer voice. Either or 
> both options are reasonable and supported by many virtual worlds, 
> including the ones currently supporting interop.
>
> The key is to move forward in a logical, step by step manner in 
> implementing more interop.

>     If a virtual world exposed a XMPP chat service, and SIP endpoints
>     for each avatar, using the protocols that already exist, then what
>     else is there to do to declare this working? What, specifically,
>     are the unsolved problems with regards to using XMPP and SIP in
>     the context of virtual worlds?
>
>     The only one I can think of is properly tying presence into the
>     SIP call, such that the voice comes from the right 3D location (we
>     use an out-of-bound message for that right now).
>