Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8

Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> Mon, 04 November 2013 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <emcho@sip-communicator.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3549421E80BC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:53:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.301, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12xbH6QM7bwi for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:53:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-f173.google.com (mail-pd0-f173.google.com [209.85.192.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B00D11E8147 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:52:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r10so6944836pdi.4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 09:52:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=3H8Z+l/LPErPy0BliVGOLumYQ+bEZOpCeokr/mfjHV0=; b=T5mE7aEX0yNPUI+Hyo27yRWZBA/DmS3vfp7yMYKxwoU+lAcooelxOBdL2VwZ6rGrNB 300xuPpQ43iajrL7EMFDvPPLbRcbnUh6i5CNAGVXXJntw1+iFRSgCec+FTyjuPYsLBTt iuD0bkq2HIpQZVx+fNxPLNABLrME4o9m79QJM0D4+9/8WE5PVvb54ASN7X6YbCKNN508 G8BaiQq011/+cQ9AaVDUfTmZhEEhpEiczhWxGd+ejlxjPyXbI32YW9gcsb13EQ+ttXOo biRHkTttrAJdN2KB+7GFxoLaTGk3TBwuoCVxKAj2Kx8v61IR7bILkwEfgjaVrtzZD8BE 48qw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkxN59+2woTAaD0i0A2A7RF4CSqC3lwrs8Hp0hWqB157Q2QCLf36ddMI8DLLW8/En97+c38
X-Received: by 10.66.171.13 with SMTP id aq13mr18793554pac.30.1383587561944; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 09:52:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x234.google.com (mail-pa0-x234.google.com [2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ed3sm29450418pbc.6.2013.11.04.09.52.41 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Nov 2013 09:52:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id bj1so7165897pad.25 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 09:52:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.66.154.1 with SMTP id vk1mr18981579pab.85.1383587561123; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 09:52:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.191.163 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:52:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF17C2D222@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
References: <CAOqqYVEER_HprgauRawO+_gGdLdMY1MUY8jrMhhi3yVDL31bFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPvvaaLpbWGZPBB1EMOPKQd_+t95bvG51NG4DnKhtEp1WSwRhg@mail.gmail.com> <BLU406-EAS3033A38C2A9CA480AFFD3B93F40@phx.gbl> <52772073.6090000@jesup.org> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF17C2D222@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
From: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:52:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPvvaaKbUtuke0uBU6M3=b7CZvRMzOqtQFa4a68Ue7QixvQCHw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 17:53:42 -0000

On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Hutton, Andrew <andrew.hutton@unify.com> wrote:
> On: 03 November 2013 20:20 Randell Jesup Wrote:
>
>
>>
>> IANAPL (I Am Not A Patent Lawyer) - but if you make an image that
>> includes Cisco's plugin for imaging machines, that would be a violation
>> of the rules - you would be the one distributing it to end-use
>> systems.  While you're unlikely to get pinged on it, the company
>> lawyers may not see it that way, and it might show up flagged in an
>> audit, and IT guys don't like that.
>>
>
> I also have a concern about this issue and made the same assumption
> however yesterday I was told by one of the Cisco experts that as long
> as it is the owner of the end devices (i.e. An enterprise) that is doing
> the distribution that would be within the rules.

So as long as no one subcontracts IT maintenance, we should be fine ;).

-- 
https://jitsi.org