Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8)

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Sat, 02 November 2013 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04D021F9344 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 08:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.542
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.542 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.058, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hei14zmQ4F6m for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 08:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE1721F933B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 08:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id ez12so2171525wid.15 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 08:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9uIIevs8GSiwL73GIJtEVi1a8kJjPIH0xjTjZnoMMWM=; b=vZAGSWpSBoUbVv1R08jou8x/7DnqVrc7CBrbSIyGTVpx07riFrIN+LyVBApsMTgLlO EPj1F5oAowbL99zZ1Y3579So34bbeic111/J3nlufTAA33yvY475n0W0u0gnzMSL924X nZO4gw9Oomf2tSZmptyIbwXU/B7hExZm3ifkTkrrhK3UZfmaeCYkGqh35osojh3v/nIj nNbNZ3OCqhCt1fW9YtOxfBaTVR6TvmfuZIL9nqwbrkSnUw179TmBl2+9LYP5qBWEh4BM xmofasTFbz7xAwVjsqzfGV7L6Elt8Q6v6x+jzU51BXNV7a0MZRmRFyY+3XS3DQXF1D5Z ri1Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.239.40 with SMTP id vp8mr143321wjc.45.1383404576049; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 08:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.202.194 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 08:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <52750E3C.9060206@bbs.darktech.org>
References: <CAOqqYVEER_HprgauRawO+_gGdLdMY1MUY8jrMhhi3yVDL31bFg@mail.gmail.com> <52740478.6030109@nostrum.com> <CAOJ7v-2+_4QZwc8vEtdwVDWSP-d-z+ggB0u+VM6WnA=f-k4-XA@mail.gmail.com> <BLU404-EAS261C783EDA4575EE1A7E53593F40@phx.gbl> <52750E3C.9060206@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 08:02:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVR9=oWVzRaRuD701tvZCtp+SO1n6c65hJELLVfB8QcOA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 15:03:02 -0000

On 2 November 2013 07:37, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote:
>     I can't think of a single platform that supports real-time H.264
> encoding/decoding natively today.

That's a very strange way to put the question.

Let me put another spin on it, and please excuse the example...

Skype runs on more platforms than you might think.  Those platforms
can all support H.264 to the extent that Skype requires.

Cisco's generous offer opens almost the same capability to anyone,
with the caveat that some platforms currently remain closed.  Of
course, you could let your ideals get in the way of progress.  Me, I'm
a pragmatist.  This gift represents a great opportunity for people who
actually care about the practical outcomes.

There's been a lot of mouth-gazing of gift horses on this list of
late.  I sure hope that this isn't representative of the real
sentiment of the community.  I'd like to think that people are better
than that.

(BTW, I understand and respect Harald's position.  From where he sits,
I'm sure that his conclusion makes perfect sense.)