Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8
Gustavo Garcia <ggb@tokbox.com> Wed, 06 November 2013 00:23 UTC
Return-Path: <ggb@tokbox.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1784211E8125 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 16:23:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iWHeffC9lDLT for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 16:23:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na3sys010aog107.obsmtp.com (na3sys010aog107.obsmtp.com [74.125.245.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EC14411E8170 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 16:23:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-f176.google.com ([209.85.220.176]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob107.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUnmL7lHlx8YETU7Vua7T30OXH/2eOCJX@postini.com; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:23:11 PST
Received: by mail-vc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ia6so6074220vcb.21 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:23:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8duetkzAxvEIzWbuuezGkRoBwQAu2Tn1a6MILW51DiI=; b=C2y55p5mpxnpHhLvfTUGupZyCT1IT+IrOueUPi/sAynvULpFMWg0Tkcrun07To29Z6 rXqFPxbdRfSzy2jeBmju8uj/btMqN/U0QOOXXXo7uDTaKj3EWZYHoKaaYDjjGt2YpFKv AMV+nT6i9LzJEwDYiOFiQGp4/Cog4htWbXBymA/mzA7Y2EUIg3DPmVW3mOwJVf+yT3Bw zfm17XhPOcK6vuSCbprz3Hg4u36sSRsgKMMBs9eQoQBlX6AHpJ/fjHrXOZ6HObfAKn+f Ef42Uq0V7MHE28DFrPVz9k9bnrisF8mCxaIN5bJ8D1f+LlIrV9HJeynsWZ+a6sljG7RR rSTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnaXMwzUOCxscAkEDLwLj//fi723rdS4TzLwji7+uFPbEdKo7ctbaGqdkeS5AVzkiLrUiqiB2rUA1tngQ8o468EJO1ytqgQQfmoN6womn0isICaQYb4URUsb5YaNG8qSbpzuByfFDmC7FkdWpPcDO3oHN4PuA==
X-Received: by 10.220.252.71 with SMTP id mv7mr129598vcb.68.1383697389989; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:23:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.252.71 with SMTP id mv7mr129590vcb.68.1383697389859; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:23:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.211.200 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 16:23:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOqqYVEER_HprgauRawO+_gGdLdMY1MUY8jrMhhi3yVDL31bFg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOqqYVEER_HprgauRawO+_gGdLdMY1MUY8jrMhhi3yVDL31bFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:23:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPvKHKgOOu8yMMiky1MyWs_BKKgkxkfWguVfsHkrMYUKmbKjsQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gustavo Garcia <ggb@tokbox.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <hta@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01227b3666570004ea77272c"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:23:16 -0000
+1 H.264 licensing as introduced by Cisco is great because it opens the door to truly present H.264 as a viable alternative codec for broad implementation in WebRTC endpoints, but Cisco’s proposal as it stands is not enough to warrant H.264 being adopted as an MTI for WebRTC. >From TokBox’s point of view, WebRTC needs to be able to solve two needs if true adoption is intended: 1) supporting interoperability with legacy end-points and 2) enabling novel and innovative real-world use-cases on a broad range of software-powered end-points (mobile included, not just browsers) The option as proposed with H.264 is not really viable in mobile native applications (specifically iOS devices as the situation stands today), whether both endpoints are mobile native or one is browser-based. At TokBox, we are already seeing a wide range of very interesting applications being built on top of WebRTC using native mobile apps as one of the endpoints, and the standard must do the right thing by not preventing these scenarios from playing out. As far as MTI codecs go, we still believe VP8 is the right option and believe H.264 should be embraced as an optional alternative video codec.The purpose of the WebRTC is not to create a browser compatible with existing solutions (many of which are closed systems) but rather to bring the best possible experience to application developers, extending the capabilities of the web for real-time communication. (More of our views here: http://www.tokbox.com/blog/is-webrtc-ready-for-h-264/) On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Harald Alvestrand <hta@google.com> wrote: > We congratulate Cisco on their intention to make an open source H.264 > codec available and usable by the community. We look forward to seeing the > result of this effort. > > Google still believes that VP8 - a freely available, fully open, > high-quality video codec that you can download, compile for your platform, > include in your binary, distribute and put into production today - is the > best choice of a Mandatory to Implement video codec for the WebRTC effort. > > Harald (sending this from my Google address) > > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > >
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcemen… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Doug Geistkemper
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Alexandre GOUAILLARD
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Alessandro Amirante
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Eric Rescorla
- [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congra… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Co… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Co… Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Co… tim panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Co… Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Co… Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Co… Bossiel thioriguel
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Gili
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Bossiel
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Bossiel
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Co… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Gili
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Gili
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Gili
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Bossiel
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Gili
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Co… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Co… Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Co… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Co… Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Kaiduan Xie
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Co… tim panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Co… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- [rtcweb] API standardization on phones? (Re: Plat… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] API standardization on phones? (Re: … DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Erik Lagerway
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Ralph Giles
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Kristian Kielhofner
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Dave Taht
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Gustavo Garcia
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Gregory Maxwell
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Krasimir Kolarov
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Krasimir Kolarov
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announc… David Singer