IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com> Tue, 14 October 2014 21:40 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@nestlabs.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC02A1A00C3 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.984
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.984 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PLING_QUERY=0.994, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w4bcC6ZH-uxQ for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f171.google.com (mail-vc0-f171.google.com [209.85.220.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DF651A00AB for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hy10so8300467vcb.16 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9Ym2t5njoBFJrctquz+QlFx1cnL1JHKOdGsLa+QUUew=; b=ON34TOBlwMpV9+SWNgK5Bl7l9BVCsMypQAgpPsu5I3MjO9laKf8XnK6pqHgA6OFN+G p3sdQBxvitzcQwWLUz2f2lAgVgmwGcCrM1za4BFUWasQFeV1GIbjfXvI5c/dlb35SXKk OQGPon++nqkwOPiiSI8AdKMAjWYJ8YiZTyreX+G6ODa9j4/TLFriRaKXlmrkgW1VFAOB sQzwnD3h5O0zglClxqtxw/As/+3ZwQsy0rLmUKq6DeGcfRMU25D4ZvVa/8aJDp5unrwW FSlkoL8cQcy4OX1VQAGcCCOQc0sPiydI3YNtNnREtShTJ0C22GSKRJ86F3FVMQ/xdB8D zX0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQntd63x8ohkKY703zEUN8ER65nKiIbulHOYJ+tgIlkkkbmJOBoeICfrn7At4jYBfE2CI/46
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.221.3.195 with SMTP id nz3mr7979867vcb.43.1413322836246; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.10.65 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <94990F79-439A-4820-B03B-BFEAB01AA515@fugue.com>
References: <72CC13D1-7E7A-4421-B23E-16D8FFAEEB58@darou.fr> <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410141020360.30853@uplift.swm.pp.se> <C52D3324-3015-45E0-88CF-D2A778D246B8@iki.fi> <CADhXe52iH_Abh3iZvpgQQYJF_FzbKkhNwzwjkcDt-DJA3RL+VA@mail.gmail.com> <70C2B2B2-A19A-4730-AB51-1EF26448445B@fugue.com> <CADhXe533umX9Q3NSbEktjcj8mBatXkDmRQKz0hOkGriBSX0t4g@mail.gmail.com> <94990F79-439A-4820-B03B-BFEAB01AA515@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:40:36 -0700
Message-ID: <CADhXe50DoZjjoG5tfidcGgtXx1TFyYECZyzeWmQstsT3=HPyaA@mail.gmail.com>
From: James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
To: HOMENET Working Group <homenet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01293fe49b98bf050568ddd4"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/4LjSFEb-1p_Y2hSFbYuQgl6Ozzc
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 21:40:38 -0000

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:

>
> When we talked about this previously, I think the idea was that when two
> networks with two sets of ULA prefixes merge, you deprecate one of them.
> [...]
>

Naturally, you deprecate one of them, but my concern is that they never
expire if the objective is for a ULA prefix to be invariant. So how many
times can a network join with others before it runs out of space for
deprecated and redundant but unexpired and invariant ULA prefixes?


-- 
james woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
Nest Labs, Communications Engineering

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email