Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Wed, 15 October 2014 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C0D1A892E for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.088
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, PLING_QUERY=0.994, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IPW3cMhyE8TG for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [83.247.10.6]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 034151A047A for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2E349; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:27:48 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:date :date:in-reply-to:from:from:subject:subject:mime-version :content-type:content-type:received:received; s=mail; t= 1413390466; bh=Ft+hDlHpXFH7imqBgAN2f5YQjZjuweT6CQg5NUcllgI=; b=Y 0CHCoD8esaanYsmTZXmK01H5X/mEEbAxOC0rggTid99EVfpauEkkM7LwlpIca6L2 tKpNIFucMYj4d3yzKeKYaoZUKhDzOxZq+PCsxK00WzkyyYzKfZeCHDkak1OBE6Zz KTr+k60oO6m6Bhl2J53J+pXCSpCupHPRG47k3wS1u0=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id dWrzNH44FIdZ; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:27:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:8640:1::a948:e9d0:959f:2316] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:8640:1:0:a948:e9d0:959f:2316]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 592DF3A; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:27:46 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
In-Reply-To: <794E4A5D-24F6-42B7-B3A2-52D5D8861ADB@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:27:45 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <94B70B36-0257-4840-A60D-D7A7C55F7216@steffann.nl>
References: <72CC13D1-7E7A-4421-B23E-16D8FFAEEB58@darou.fr> <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <C7F3DE60-F596-4BAD-9C28-74006966E5B9@fugue.com> <20141014142746.GX31092@Space.Net> <69B1F2CB-88C6-4211-83F3-11C8A3E7BFD2@fugue.com> <20141014145930.GY31092@Space.Net> <m1Xe3jL-0000I7C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20141014154111.GZ31092@Space.Net> <C6760B68-C913-4B22-98E6-6D29A66F80D9@fugue.com> <20141015150422.GW31092@Space.Net> <4E2E154E-D231-4E79-860A-56948A13CDD4@fugue.com> <794E4A5D-24F6-42B7-B3A2-52D5D8861ADB@gmail.com>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/PIzVIWzJvsgzm6BPjs7fmGXqQ2c
Cc: HOMENET Working Group <homenet@ietf.org>, Philip Homburg <PC.Homburg-3@pub.phicoh.com>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, =?utf-8?Q?Gert_D=C3=B6ring?= <gert@space.net>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:27:51 -0000

Hi Ralph,

>> In particular, you appear to be arguing as if ULAs and GUAs are treated identically by IPv6 stacks, but they are not.
> 
> Really?  In what way are they not treated identically by IPv6 stacks?

ULA space does have a separate entry in the policy table of RFC 6724 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6724#section-2.1)

Chees,
Sander