Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 16 October 2014 13:15 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03671A003A for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.394
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.394 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PLING_QUERY=0.994, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lHA0SBNTBKfg for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22d.google.com (mail-ig0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66BA21A1B91 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-f173.google.com with SMTP id h18so19340740igc.12 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=OyQV9mKkQxTaOnXIBO6TBxTnIi6+0cjbPYhrNpynO1s=; b=ZavtZdprh4t5PmSaJyjoGmf2k+aM01wz14ZQzfGJu0KMsiaWPTvqFHzqqB6rP+mDqA TgOa50TaCfHDk5FDFwndgaIs8FilvEA7U7ZasUok5/8j7P+Bcx0IKLQUlTD4DKBszvu3 s/jaJDr74WEjBSSKmvtFlVJs6SGJv3Ygjr0bPLyL6UabciY8tMM9K6tFTbGTPwrrmf1h vXQaK2kn8yyf7lWzmjP8dWcx5uFEW1/JvQkKxxyzHYJIpPWFbc6OqMlO08jYzSYJ8jAC H5ncVr4vn6HdazJv39h7j++7o8DUGN6I5IxL5e8X9LVsTjUVr7/vZtCbxE2rXwHVSnAl dU4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=OyQV9mKkQxTaOnXIBO6TBxTnIi6+0cjbPYhrNpynO1s=; b=Hi7cCLyz6ZpeINJ9APdHwiCcEXJ2wAZerg3mbunQo6m5hDRJjseohHcdc+80nbJZrZ 8jC8g8emIA9HkO1eLwp507pv4t9TqoX5WivUFNcISd6FTdoWw8fGKpy7TlasaL3yu2tz X8GdO/aXar3w04bXzcaZk+YJO9v3VBuPtdi7QHQ6e+4bQj8pdBrVGsLJqsZ9TJ7BmWPM JsC1f/55Bjf8w6ARHslHjilGPj0O4reDYK1e1mYoRfJVxAL3zNMg46/w3CWhD/LTgV9s AYpvhHW4whBoIxpZnJWg4FeV/1jRju2HOK8HuNen13N66WvONvGMJoK3ABw8qsCPMdqp UlqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnB/7LSKLj9KHj6fM+JXhCT1xyhJtXdRlbRl8izZTkJ6mtlmY7eDKPG+4rbYVDdfqGqTdUX
X-Received: by 10.107.167.66 with SMTP id q63mr1471937ioe.23.1413465324802; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.8.242 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <457D177C-232E-4590-A9ED-80048140157F@fugue.com>
References: <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <C7F3DE60-F596-4BAD-9C28-74006966E5B9@fugue.com> <20141014142746.GX31092@Space.Net> <69B1F2CB-88C6-4211-83F3-11C8A3E7BFD2@fugue.com> <20141014145930.GY31092@Space.Net> <m1Xe3jL-0000I7C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20141014154111.GZ31092@Space.Net> <C6760B68-C913-4B22-98E6-6D29A66F80D9@fugue.com> <20141015150422.GW31092@Space.Net> <4E2E154E-D231-4E79-860A-56948A13CDD4@fugue.com> <20141015154841.GY31092@Space.Net> <CBC8A3D9-9EBD-47FF-B066-247898FF2000@fugue.com> <543EA248.2080700@mtcc.com> <CB50B30B-DC36-4354-96B7-19AE415BD03F@fugue.com> <543EBE40.3030201@mtcc.com> <BA5ABBFA-9D13-4975-A96C-530FE958322A@fugue.com> <543ED2A7.3090409@mtcc.com> <1569644A-50C4-47B6-908E-262BC62BCD14@fugue.com> <543EFBF1.6040101@mtcc.com> <457D177C-232E-4590-A9ED-80048140157F@fugue.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 22:15:04 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1kix0HxWsC4n7ta4EG-6YhMMdYCTnFFXGb2ATQBbkMHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141dd08967ffb05058a0a6f
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/91g-3xmkyorEEb6Op5srLOgPips
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>, Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:15:27 -0000

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:

> Suppose you are connected to your homenet.   You are streaming video from
> your jukebox using your ULA.   Now your device switches to your neighbor's
> Wifi, which is advertising a different GUA and a different ULA.   At this
> point your device does a flash renumber because it realizes it's no longer
> on the same network, and that the prefixes it had are no longer valid.
>
> At this point, your application should get a notification from the stack
> that the connection has broken, at which point it should reconnect to your
> jukebox.


Ted, you're going in circles here. You've been arguing for many messages
that we should use ULAs because GUAs can be flash renumbered. And now you
provide an example of an event that *is* a flash renumbering, and then
proceed to say that everything will be fine because the application will
reconnect.

Pick one position or the other?