Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 16 October 2014 13:47 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E851A00F1 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.394
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.394 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PLING_QUERY=0.994, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PYPZn7CP1D33 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22d.google.com (mail-ie0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A3BD1A0123 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id tp5so3457867ieb.32 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=AOH8MSOTIGsxbFiPDwtX2Ya7pjBV0gw5SoiJ5OUT1Qo=; b=M5zbw+g0y9NzdQm0uOa/xYoxhY9jSqyZ8dI4jH32XKb7XCFGZi3k9tyBDwHgpJXs3Z BbjJNbxdSZ2S/oQTcjCaU4UPPEM8en4IJnYvr9EbWvaNXycreTMfMSnoTAwyA0tiSPC9 DpCAko0IJDRzs2VENuyihgxhK1HPuZJzEWhAAEol/aqlENk7t4emXs9m/xxA218GCjSa U7OFNxbmYoW+4ZAOM0qmt6UG221l9vv6en6y87cJMBLj1I1EBm7Yjq5XDV5D3ZU7VlEm 1LLqi87r/i+kQMF7BgriBBtFxtpIi3QhQxSrFRw1r3MBsSKxO6RLKrRqKvZWCW4GYLRU 43pA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=AOH8MSOTIGsxbFiPDwtX2Ya7pjBV0gw5SoiJ5OUT1Qo=; b=TnsguY7AvEd5h3nif+jwMxMbqauu3SLmIeGujZ5lMcmSER3Skp4pdOK3jvYN1282jH P/CCcZShD0qqCPXILbhHidyJGQn6t8FtEG21yo8NbvaMWwoPW7b7f2Sze7gZA96Nfdo1 kGkqqs7/dCIJFpwZBMKaY47uF5DEh1qKTm8SEd3Exly4D0RPpnFESZ3EGMAZ86/TEfH7 UbFpIH/uH2Ndp3ejns1vBRoFzRp17LXiMjsQYiqUF10xTNKjTfeT2KcPEiAQ74Mb7xhk spG5FBq36TLkM5jj/FAuO0NQ8GX1F569J8SCpP8rlv9MQwYjkLWraUC5sGx0aqqJ3FRc VSqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlmCKtINw+jQMU2FQkIXtZcDiHzK7hxtGR0aH4okQMgULJo3wAAHla+vZnseTT4mNdEaZZu
X-Received: by 10.107.17.206 with SMTP id 75mr1670810ior.90.1413467218707; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.8.242 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61130EA399B@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <C7F3DE60-F596-4BAD-9C28-74006966E5B9@fugue.com> <20141014142746.GX31092@Space.Net> <69B1F2CB-88C6-4211-83F3-11C8A3E7BFD2@fugue.com> <20141014145930.GY31092@Space.Net> <m1Xe3jL-0000I7C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20141014154111.GZ31092@Space.Net> <C6760B68-C913-4B22-98E6-6D29A66F80D9@fugue.com> <20141015150422.GW31092@Space.Net> <4E2E154E-D231-4E79-860A-56948A13CDD4@fugue.com> <20141015154841.GY31092@Space.Net> <CBC8A3D9-9EBD-47FF-B066-247898FF2000@fugue.com> <543EA248.2080700@mtcc.com> <CB50B30B-DC36-4354-96B7-19AE415BD03F@fugue.com> <543EBE40.3030201@mtcc.com> <BA5ABBFA-9D13-4975-A96C-530FE958322A@fugue.com> <543ED2A7.3090409@mtcc.com> <1569644A-50C4-47B6-908E-262BC62BCD14@fugue.com> <543EFBF1.6040101@mtcc.com> <20141015232619.D687121808CE@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAKD1Yr2aLTjEo=7yj+=RzU8vpQTG6UjsuUJq+ONJmMTOEF43SQ@mail.gmail.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61130EA399B@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 22:46:38 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2fpygG2EiFFEEGHBJgme761BWsadgxTONUetewKYg_=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f4fd679393605058a7b65
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/RODw07fJentYwU4scGW39QlFTSY
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>, Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:47:00 -0000

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:34 PM, STARK, BARBARA H <bs7652@att.com> wrote:

> No, the RFC 6724 rules are recommended *default* rules. The authors of
> that RFC did an excellent job at making that clear. IMO, users (who know
> how) should be free to change the default rules in their devices if they
> don't like those rules. Application developers are free to implement
> whatever rules make sense for their applications. I've been involved with
> applications where the default rules would have caused increased complexity
> in application design, so rules that made sense for that app were used
> instead.
>

It seems to me that if you were more of an application developer and less
of a network engineer you would not have such a high opinion of the degree
of knowledge about (and interest for) networking generally possessed by
application developers. :-)