Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Wed, 15 October 2014 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@Space.Net>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BEA1A8768 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, PLING_QUERY=0.994, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VY6VVYKtBHQu for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:04:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8DA71A874C for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: homenet@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8232609A3 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:04:22 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 878966032F for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:04:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 77093 invoked by uid 1007); 15 Oct 2014 17:04:22 +0200
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:04:22 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-ID: <20141015150422.GW31092@Space.Net>
References: <72CC13D1-7E7A-4421-B23E-16D8FFAEEB58@darou.fr> <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <C7F3DE60-F596-4BAD-9C28-74006966E5B9@fugue.com> <20141014142746.GX31092@Space.Net> <69B1F2CB-88C6-4211-83F3-11C8A3E7BFD2@fugue.com> <20141014145930.GY31092@Space.Net> <m1Xe3jL-0000I7C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20141014154111.GZ31092@Space.Net> <C6760B68-C913-4B22-98E6-6D29A66F80D9@fugue.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JfAz7WldtWFtponG"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C6760B68-C913-4B22-98E6-6D29A66F80D9@fugue.com>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/YwyB90QGG1LMBzosbz63TA4T-K0
Cc: HOMENET Working Group <homenet@ietf.org>, Philip Homburg <PC.Homburg-3@pub.phicoh.com>, Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 15:04:37 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:21:12AM -0500, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Oct 14, 2014, at 10:41 AM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
> > That reply doesn't surprise me the least, it's the standard answer from
> > every geek who has not spent a few weeks thinking about this :-)
> 
> This isn't a helpful response, Gert.   If you are right, you can
> explain the reason that you are right.   You don't have to accuse
> the people you are talking to of not thinking this through.

I explained my reasoning.  Multiple times.  Here and on other lists.  Again
and again.  And I spend a lot of time testing things, running against walls,
and telling people what needs to be improved to make it work.  Since years.

But I still run headlong into the typical geek response "I do things in
my network that are not compatible to this" - and, well, so do I, but
that is a completely irrelevant point of view when talking about homenets
that are used by millions of non-geeks plus a few IETF geeks.

*This* is the widening of horizon that is needed for meaningful contribution
to this discussion.  "I'll just get me a tunnel" is not.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279