IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

Wuyts Carl <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com> Tue, 14 October 2014 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744D91A8941 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, PLING_QUERY=0.994, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5bjhIwI8afEF for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0775.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:775]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FB1B1A8927 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BN1PR0201MB0674.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.160.169.150) by BN1PR0201MB0674.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.160.169.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1049.19; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:36:56 +0000
Received: from BN1PR0201MB0674.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.169.150]) by BN1PR0201MB0674.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.169.150]) with mapi id 15.00.1049.012; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:36:56 +0000
From: Wuyts Carl <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Thread-Topic: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
Thread-Index: AQHP54K0vE/OjWpAb0mPoL0zPh7VxpwvPjQAgABcm4CAAAw3AIAAA/SAgAAO1iA=
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:36:56 +0000
Message-ID: <9092f8fc5c7849cba3485896b847466c@BN1PR0201MB0674.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <72CC13D1-7E7A-4421-B23E-16D8FFAEEB58@darou.fr> <CAAedzxp1R-C5E9RJVMVLRJxPc0w4zooPtqnvWK9eggpZu4=xtg@mail.gmail.com> <C7F3DE60-F596-4BAD-9C28-74006966E5B9@fugue.com> <20141014142746.GX31092@Space.Net> <69B1F2CB-88C6-4211-83F3-11C8A3E7BFD2@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <69B1F2CB-88C6-4211-83F3-11C8A3E7BFD2@fugue.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [188.188.67.163]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1PR0201MB0674;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-forefront-prvs: 03648EFF89
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(51404002)(189002)(13464003)(199003)(24454002)(21056001)(50986999)(76482002)(95666004)(99286002)(120916001)(106356001)(93886004)(85306004)(77096002)(107046002)(40100003)(105586002)(106116001)(19580395003)(108616004)(19580405001)(99396003)(87936001)(101416001)(2656002)(74316001)(85852003)(86362001)(122556002)(80022003)(92566001)(46102003)(4396001)(64706001)(97736003)(54356999)(33646002)(15975445006)(76176999)(66066001)(20776003)(31966008)(76576001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1PR0201MB0674; H:BN1PR0201MB0674.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: technicolor.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/N1Y8GjwrypC3HYPahlLrPvW-4-M
Cc: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>, HOMENET Working Group <homenet@ietf.org>, Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:37:21 -0000

Initially, the requested "old" prefix did not get nack'd after the expiry date, resulting in an "outage" of around 10 seconds, so approx. 10 secs without v6 connectivity.  These days, the old requested / hinted prefix gets nacked by the dhcpv6 server, enforcing new state machine cycle.  This works very well.

Regs
Carl


-----Original Message-----
From: homenet [mailto:homenet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon
Sent: dinsdag 14 oktober 2014 16:42
To: Gert Doering
Cc: Erik Kline; HOMENET Working Group; Pierre Pfister
Subject: Re: [homenet] Let's make in-home ULA presence a MUST !?

On Oct 14, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
> "flash renumber is a problem" is pretty much a non-argument, as flash 
> renumbering *will* happen, and devices in the home *will* have to handle it.

Indeed.   The question is, should we increase the number of instances in which they are forced to handle it, or no?

> Carriers do it today - "here's a new /56, have fun", without even 
> having to reconnect.

If this generates phone calls, they may change their minds.   It's early days yet.

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email