IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Supervision under previous admin relationships (was Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work)

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Fri, 02 August 2019 18:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64C11207DE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 11:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=PRK5/lPu; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=aqFm9EwQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ECMYtoZLt3u for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 11:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.yitter.info (mx4.yitter.info [159.203.56.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 776831207B3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 11:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE689BCCC7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 18:27:01 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1564770421; bh=A3EMexjNdmkMVsc3qJ432Z300k8wAtC9GWjnmDs57gQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PRK5/lPu2UHiisYDzHE5GiFahHktvqNvqItc/2r9xHpoMVoIl8dZXp4TLW8fl9NzK zB5lmX9h02j0KgJ/oIfE1ZQb83qhQSgibkizz714nr/qtWNTgibg8ybaC+ynmWJXR7 V3OkevftSiSASjfMNCO9QEcTuy8/slrgOh6Fznrc=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx4.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx4.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45FRChiK-yGN for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 18:27:00 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 14:27:00 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1564770420; bh=A3EMexjNdmkMVsc3qJ432Z300k8wAtC9GWjnmDs57gQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=aqFm9EwQT29OSlTox/hdnhVfS0eD2jLGO3+Bea9+1V1+dM8VsrivYjnHULIgvlNiT eNv3GG2tlX0IOrAzU5LDYR2XyUWaVr8DGKYpZbN0LE8dwL1FHsrINqiSe62sgu8/eu ir8Q8rx3lDjo5QYHtvQT5NFxjTNbY8lGfmLmnbRM=
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Supervision under previous admin relationships (was Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work)
Message-ID: <20190802182700.fkff2jrsdfstnfgr@mx4.yitter.info>
References: <21882.1564430860@localhost> <8ce5bf75-7040-4b6c-32fc-0042cc6dbfc2@comcast.net> <848781BF-6AF6-4DB2-A845-6A6449B36FBF@cooperw.in> <92dd887b-7c32-134d-4f12-ad8ff75da791@comcast.net> <C5DB2EEF-E075-47CA-87D5-699B594C2D9B@cooperw.in> <b33673ed-5a17-4552-a395-1244c85c969f@comcast.net> <m2d0hoskmk.wl-randy@psg.com> <20190801213032.m3nkmqioyuxhzed3@mx4.yitter.info> <162df5b9-a6fd-69f2-eb7d-36a89ec0afaa@comcast.net> <20190802164828.whsvwy7ozbeyx57j@mx4.yitter.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190802164828.whsvwy7ozbeyx57j@mx4.yitter.info>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4s5kNN8lDv-mOthclSrvoMNU1D0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 18:27:34 -0000

Hi,

I'm writing with my ISOC hat on.

On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 12:48:29PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> The contractors didn't have a say in this assignment, since such
> agreements contained an assignment clause permitting ISOC to assign as
> it wanted.

Someone reminded me off-list that last October we did execute an
agreement with the contracted parties acknowledging and accepting the
assignment.  I'd forgotten about this until prompted.  It was
something I was pleased we undertook because I rather dislike
assignment without explicit agreement.  I nevertheless believe that
this was a bit of tidy up paperwork, because effectively the Internet
Society committed to the transfer in the August agreement I referred
to before.

My apologies for misrepresenting the details.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email