Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work

"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> Sat, 27 July 2019 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07299120044 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Jul 2019 12:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LikG5-EfedNu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Jul 2019 12:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from copdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (copdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com [162.150.44.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80285120018 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Jul 2019 12:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=comcast.com; s=20190412; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@comcast.com; t=1564256276; x=2428169876; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:CC:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=67XkrnB55taqEEDsplmJluTq9MleEVH+1buRRA9DxB0=; b=UPdXGj/o+Q3cepc3j38cFu4uMSQfUCcJMKoBr55vlWRcPLB8aOG5p4aV3pxuQvhY tJHWTngZ5uHTW3FaFrh52kyVvyAjCPexiTWV6K+qL4Bnu2C9zMBbWWooGbhLCmQY tvyyZdULqgu9MLnNU5OcccIqO6gaOHNrtKcBuiYKcmR6+Jp+aPf0NTIj01Hx/cqR 7y15JJ4m6FvbiHJVNoZ3RDiMHZXKl4VcdJOjBtCPmjlr4LDhHSmh0x6Qae4WoaZM Zq57td9UEoSF1n88Ome46joEpyehx13D0xIgLah4GrHYUf0egwVq+Y4DYhB+/QFn laC1IIxvN447o8NzNPewkw==;
X-AuditID: a2962c47-ab9ff7000002e144-da-5d3ca814af59
Received: from copdcexc39.cable.comcast.com (copdcmhoutvip.cable.comcast.com [96.114.156.147]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by copdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id AB.06.57668.418AC3D5; Sat, 27 Jul 2019 13:37:56 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.136) by copdcexc39.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Sat, 27 Jul 2019 15:38:10 -0400
Received: from COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8a94]) by COPDCEXC37.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe36:8a94%15]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.008; Sat, 27 Jul 2019 15:38:10 -0400
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
To: John Wroclawski <jtw@isi.edu>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
CC: RSOC <rsoc@iab.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
Thread-Topic: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
Thread-Index: AQHVQIxeYPkBjngpykujzA2aagVsDqbcBrmAgALd0AA=
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 19:38:10 +0000
Message-ID: <F6C97564-6DD6-47A2-A9E6-5401F50BE4D5@cable.comcast.com>
References: <9817BB4B-D828-4128-A70C-A8B966E6642F@encrypted.net> <CAL02cgRcGF80R_h5it_u7eGQrMjavpZ6_noEKb5vY5i1HqJYaA@mail.gmail.com> <7e82f47a-6a1d-8d3e-b183-e5159a071481@gmail.com> <9f7e969e-0374-2f9f-4ec6-e2d85a2fb819@gmail.com> <B027130E-8357-44C7-AAAF-FA11C249FD92@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <B027130E-8357-44C7-AAAF-FA11C249FD92@isi.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1b.0.190715
x-originating-ip: [68.87.29.9]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <CFCD8E072FE20842A88C1C88F4957FF6@comcast.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrNKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWSUDRnsq7ICptYg6uLJS3aLu5jsni2cT6L xcfPL5ksrh7mcWDx2DnrLrvHrasvmT2WLPnJ5LH7/VaWAJaoBkabkoyi1MQSl9S01LziVDsu BQxgk5Sall+U6ppYlFMZlJqTmohdGUhlSmpOZllqkT5WY/SxmpPQxZTxaPEm1oIdXBUb3ok3 ME7h6mLk5JAQMJH4e/0cUxcjF4eQwBEmiRWbXzBDOC1MEt/bFrFBOKcZJSae/ccK0sImYCZx d+EVZhBbRCBE4tqbn4wgNrOArcTEvbfBbGGgmp9n3rJC1JhLXLl2iRHCtpJo/zsTzGYRUJXo mPGBHcTmFXCR6Nu9khVi2TwmiUkb3oAlOAWsJTrmPWUCsRkFxCS+n1rDBLFMXOLWk/lMED8I SCzZc54ZwhaVePkY4lBRAX2JL+c2sUDE5SSW/bwDVMMB1KspsX6XPsQYK4nrfSfZIWxFiSnd D6HuEZQ4OfMJVKu4xOEjO1gnMErOQrJ5FsKkWUgmzUIyaRaSSQsYWVcx8hqaGekZmhromZjo mRtuYgQmqUXTdNx3MH44H3uIUYCDUYmHt2CJTawQa2JZcWXuIUYJDmYlEd4tStaxQrwpiZVV qUX58UWlOanFhxilOViUxHkPT9aIFRJITyxJzU5NLUgtgskycXBKNTDGnz/4+p+i2ucHkX/+ WRU+uifDV9D5QFFb0bVkhmKAuFLWTj33u4X2boy6M3Ytj+p/YGGgt+d1WByLVtH5E/d0fNWr ruy80fDx6xbx3TZlqXeYTedF2U04LyDo/FJap86qmT2Y/9DxMvf5f/ZNasgNOZJvlGLFPdH/ OU+A703Pr49tYpTzZZRYijMSDbWYi4oTAc4sKKtOAwAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/mZ-gcYuira5SinvcXF-OI-rdEV4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 19:38:14 -0000

On 7/25/19, 3:52 PM, "ietf on behalf of John Wroclawski" <ietf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of jtw@isi.edu> wrote:
>    The basic gestalt of a search committee process is to find the best person in the world for a job, whether or not that person would have otherwise applied, or even whether they had any idea beforehand that the job existed and they’d be good at it.
>    The basic mindset of an RFP process is to pick the best person that applies. 
>    I think the IETF wants option one.
    
[JL] If this is the case, I wonder if it much matters to the community whether the role is an employee (full or part time) or a contractor (full or part time)? Or whether that might be left open-ended to depend upon the particulars of the country in which someone resides or their other commitments & preferences. IIRC, Sean Turner raised this question perhaps six months ago - which of course predated the current situation (so views may have changed). 

Jason