Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Fri, 26 July 2019 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93297120071 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 14:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RtLykiEN6uuz for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 14:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x336.google.com (mail-ot1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CC5E120047 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 14:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x336.google.com with SMTP id l15so56728513otn.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 14:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Qm03Mv/owLpSiuFVtechQcUOGXHh2nlIn8Alin7aQqQ=; b=xP1nNVaLqKVJM+eZ9rlBZrbCsvKxv2i8I34+uUYP1T04rD67ZtoHUsqzDCZkGdDjhF 9V3rtBh8D8S2ph8TUEfr08mCzgitWuziM/8gsZrVdGNX+LwaD8qrsJ/WpfOVyIel0zwk oON1gxmaELPlj7Sh3Yn+DwdUwExOTDhCIPQHbkWupjO8e/S8p9HwihM6ZDKD77htmX5A gPAOAjn6JvNVteaZJ0UqiQdTo1z+DbwdnH1SGcj28N0cQbSDphri5dswEJj9Ej2+3YPI 2rrTezNUSZRxxlaRjkgliJgX18nf+qB353YiqQj39RDf9sN0YpUJB2iEM5WUtLWlGagS O7GA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Qm03Mv/owLpSiuFVtechQcUOGXHh2nlIn8Alin7aQqQ=; b=sWc3RfVv3wzlwWgv7zYpSKmN5i5zpsMqJM0KIEj7V5SOJOnncPLxbstWrJuAgDap5U CmCCPRo/cryMJDuyEC+SvEVlaV06UrCw1iwsABtbBiVWipD9Uu8BVL8GtvBK5weEN2YQ cpevOQmueglLsn2YEfsj34hHzKyd+OGIZ9Mgw61tVl3qwcd7LcRlCb8FCHWQfxvzHiGQ VYvr4cGnuBx7efIAmDcXY0xOjFHE4oDCsmrAHf1HggF2NKlcVJrESlqtuKzUuvoD5Zbr aHKA/7qPImZuKQq+GrwNVd3fSpvG5BzDJ6XumP/NeVX3saZabcSKuoKK2Qo9mhWYJ/AP NDRw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVs7tE/To0jWI6fvjcPEpIUu6Ho+xEpumQK9OG4XsrbxD2bAe2x Vi2agzfZa8v46zxz+hgyF72YQRYSHARM0yUPOmbHZM/5
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyyCa3njO3L9v5PYeU6SXCUeBYxAhLtJjBZT5imlme8D3AP3BdpNL2z4RQq/oCviEgCm8cVIKQ/PLsP7bzfMk8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1542:: with SMTP id l2mr33778041otp.241.1564176877267; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 14:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <9817BB4B-D828-4128-A70C-A8B966E6642F@encrypted.net> <CAL02cgRcGF80R_h5it_u7eGQrMjavpZ6_noEKb5vY5i1HqJYaA@mail.gmail.com> <7e82f47a-6a1d-8d3e-b183-e5159a071481@gmail.com> <9f7e969e-0374-2f9f-4ec6-e2d85a2fb819@gmail.com> <B027130E-8357-44C7-AAAF-FA11C249FD92@isi.edu> <90BEE571-76F4-4294-8DFE-CD89BCAF0529@gmail.com> <341ed6e9-043d-91a5-d1b6-ef36b1f9cc63@mnt.se> <CAL02cgThuOxUKeDSz-a9eo9+KBj1_OAk8W=_x=qUSMrKXSyvrw@mail.gmail.com> <1789645f-f6c3-0154-92e5-8618c9ec484b@mnt.se>
In-Reply-To: <1789645f-f6c3-0154-92e5-8618c9ec484b@mnt.se>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 17:34:24 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgRga=f=vMSdLcCQAdth8562SgBZ-yD8Rsskn0N_e5byOg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000022c6e2058e9c4f7c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/dweY0dQC2FP1uVjJwtdS1u8UL-s>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 21:34:40 -0000

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 10:43 Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> wrote:

>
>
> On 2019-07-26 14:30, Richard Barnes wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 00:05 Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se
> > <mailto:leifj@mnt.se>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >     > I completely agree.  This should be treated as a search, not
> >     writing an RFP and see who applies.
> >
> >     Thats absolutely right - people & community over process!
> >
> >
> > This seems ironic, given how focused this thread has been on process.
> > The process (RFP vs search) doesn’t matter — either way we need to get
> > the best person for the role.
> >
> > To put it in contrast to Klensin’s comment at the plenary — just because
> > someone is engaged as a contractor doesn’t make them a bag of nails.
>
> Richard,
>
> That is not what "people over process" means.
>
> What I mean is this: you find the right person for the job and then you
> figure out how to get them into the position to do the job.
>
> Maybe I should have said "people before process".
>
>         Cheers Leif


You say this as if the right person just appears out of thin air.  There’s
always a process to find the right person, whether that’s posting a job
description and collecting CVs or posting an RFP and collecting RFP
responses.

The only way you find the right person without a process is to pick someone
you already know.  It would be irresponsible of this community to limit
ourselves in that way.

—Richard