Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work

heather flanagan <hlflanagan@gmail.com> Mon, 15 July 2019 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <hlflanagan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937B6120099 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 09:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y3bVWmPiJNyr for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 09:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67E38120026 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 09:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id u17so7987646pgi.6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 09:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version; bh=0h9ZPfXEicX9ge/huWrqgUKbn8+3ONwQ3zYZqB4WW10=; b=NUm1NXIjftvEGTt/AvdrDdYJMV2K+B35mZK1RJsydsTqn7RiVMWVHaCI32CIDgeeYK F77YuK+tULs1bf16Y4jJYlkIZzxKS2q8zHYlG7ofcmMybQsGbaO+MKag4bARuwStctUg yO5A/qYTNMKOXMajevDtWSej7/IuZW+xXN/81pwzEAcYfA6W8ywtTZYVm1ktybEssiHU e23EatgfeOeoo7Yyr1Bb+O4OpNWdijljhiNoei2peYjlW7JG5VJYo2H9hFdDYCNI92B7 IWy25UbSZW8mt/tNlPkjv4mxNzU2idyqmh1HT6s08c49nQyBMO8MayIN8Q2OA0IEr73M b29Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version; bh=0h9ZPfXEicX9ge/huWrqgUKbn8+3ONwQ3zYZqB4WW10=; b=lPByC1KGvbMGiZAlnIMTmFf8YDq+H9cjlf8kdi/byE3ofBQSY6nIfAdE0+0Nc1oSu9 xN3xugau0QMdcQCf+n4OdqySgOWdUTPJah70mxiRc3sl83NkqjFVd+9WiYnabaDWR7oH 3C8YKTnL8fxhFq9VicHmmnm4ynzxzxADnbIbEAsTXx5Kuz1homFnwGfn5ghXWYFbVSpX Nw4b3jnqKF5+FqelFhimV8A/tzmSr+Mw634ZaG9H5M8hil2LehLL4DLYwQXrlYQPUXLJ BTKtEOQE5aeOjY9pb4f578lHz3J63n1hJpxMf5i2gwd64zjBJKxOGUEwAlSIF+zDWro/ qKXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXsf+6NgHcPUZAE1DEHoQ3+B5/TSRexU7tNenw8XSFnvCwa2Qf8 HOEI2GAWe1x3flmi9KJ6fyY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzVneWnJYeOtDThuhNOZPdiiBirGxrPa/MBpzI7PB0moZ3qNrhpB+oeQGkqOYpgLdVRf9qrwA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:c203:: with SMTP id b3mr28337733pgd.450.1563209339938; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 09:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.198.42.38] (c-71-231-216-10.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [71.231.216.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z68sm17053970pgz.88.2019.07.15.09.48.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Jul 2019 09:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 09:48:52 -0700
From: heather flanagan <hlflanagan@gmail.com>
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "rsoc@iab.org" <rsoc@iab.org>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Message-ID: <cb4fa294-877e-4327-9158-03850655f87f@Spark>
In-Reply-To: <66B08F82-E1F7-4525-89D3-60CCC1B975F7@akamai.com>
References: <9817BB4B-D828-4128-A70C-A8B966E6642F@encrypted.net> <429ed9b6-89ab-8530-b898-e72e04e37171@mnt.se> <66B08F82-E1F7-4525-89D3-60CCC1B975F7@akamai.com>
Subject: Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
X-Readdle-Message-ID: cb4fa294-877e-4327-9158-03850655f87f@Spark
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5d2cae79_4d08a9e4_13f3e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Z3xAwWBKE5L2yerE-pnYwJG66M8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:49:03 -0000

On Jul 15, 2019, 9:39 AM -0700, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com>, wrote:
> > I don't think its a good idea to include "experience as an RFC author"
>
> Strongly agree. We want a good technical copy-editor, which strikes almost all RFC authors from consideration, IMO.
>

To chime in on this particular point - no, you don’t want a good technical copy editor, at least not as a primary skill. The RSE never directly edits Internet Drafts. Someone with experience being a professional editor for a scholarly journal gets you closer.

Some useful reading material:

https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/resource-library/editorial-policies/white-paper-on-publication-ethics/2-1-editor-roles-and-responsibilities/

Heather