Re: [Rsoc] RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 24 July 2019 06:15 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC42F120091; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 23:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=AuBvG2GE; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=sQtf/2Hz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WVnTLEhGr5mP; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 23:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FD7120276; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 23:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.189.201]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x6O6EuE1020838 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 23:15:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1563948909; x=1564035309; bh=hDK4XncIqHCTjYtgjclSCAJ1RsGN9UYjKnCAQzFi/XA=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=AuBvG2GEtRYfRvAFRQfviRopAsxQ4cpuAZWmM9o4vprU75EhUTAyt6gVzFdTi2891 gGZw1kQcL6oQ+9UPBjtB2TWpdm8QpihSd8a5lUc4bqB4AWBCBdTrJs08jBDJ1GWu7w 73SCJ9oAtWHhG8DUquRlNeM7gknSJ/duvpXWvP6A=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1563948909; x=1564035309; i=@elandsys.com; bh=hDK4XncIqHCTjYtgjclSCAJ1RsGN9UYjKnCAQzFi/XA=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=sQtf/2HzIUlbJhktbN3Gyw4y1+DRByb9Mk++6B+kutyENdo8QIbStXubMsJZ8IicF H/Lb3RkXJFvQ31uOHQ+jpNXzjs50BlOudzCbn72iKvW6j6fzinriWPV9ak8OUMRHO3 zbgYyLDVUkPoSrT8yzmhLqYeYGIatINNuDI0OX4A=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190723230523.0c1c9110@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 23:13:35 -0700
To: Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: [Rsoc] RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
Cc: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, rsoc@iab.org
In-Reply-To: <4E9AC51A-EA10-4AF5-939C-3EDCCE0631D9@encrypted.net>
References: <9817BB4B-D828-4128-A70C-A8B966E6642F@encrypted.net> <CAL02cgRcGF80R_h5it_u7eGQrMjavpZ6_noEKb5vY5i1HqJYaA@mail.gmail.com> <7e82f47a-6a1d-8d3e-b183-e5159a071481@gmail.com> <9f7e969e-0374-2f9f-4ec6-e2d85a2fb819@gmail.com> <CAL02cgSj4VcKsxawO140yNqAEtk==-Ek9=kvntvTb401BRrhYQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190722140432.13b71028@elandnews.com> <577569C8-284F-4232-AF50-DD6F07F92EA2@encrypted.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20190723002458.0cd78150@elandnews.com> <4E9AC51A-EA10-4AF5-939C-3EDCCE0631D9@encrypted.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/X4iRObxJeg6HsYjUEx8tumdC4IQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 06:15:15 -0000

Hi Sarah,
At 06:01 PM 23-07-2019, Sarah Banks wrote:
>    Can you help me understand a bit more the ask here; could you 
> expand a bit on what you're thinking about when you say "information"?

I read the following: "During the creation of this document, it was 
expected that the RSOC would describe the process it ultimately 
selected to the community.  The RSOC did involve the community in 
interim considerations when that was likely to be of 
value.  Following completion of the selection process, the RSOC will 
determine the best way to share information learned and experience 
gained with the community and determine how to best preserve that 
information for future use".  I was thinking about whether there is a 
report of what was learned from what was done previously.  I used the 
word "information" not to make the request too difficult.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy