IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rsoc] RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work

Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> Mon, 15 July 2019 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mstjohns@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD19120277 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 12:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BGeovmVgF9an for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 12:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EC541200F9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 12:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.97]) by resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id n0QrhNSpe544Sn6lChivbN; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 19:35:42 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=20190202a; t=1563219342; bh=6Lc2rD21DDCvxshPi4WccdjJgF0WRPuOPDv6maClfFg=; h=Received:Received:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=DhlSMtQv4zp4v4cD3b+dSDbZmcesKzItBxgNj9u2ZjWyIoir9iIx36T5x6D18sYCV Jm+dsWStcgjMWiLh1Ehmofgm7OIi6mAOz2dJSK3bD8w0+zFz9/nyAnJuH9+3NNax5Q EoDcSNDDTuSv4Z6RXO483R5EDjSKZjcF8V1N+OcxBePUl5cxreUsvstexK7o5yhmps PmaFqIS6IRyG1NUFpqVz8ro1+kgfp4oWfmO7X+Ho6h0/n/LBNw0sI9UBngHSzL6w6B zfiihLEKPKr78VXs8mXJ7RJ+h+Ffjww6X/MUpt7PBmO4VB7nhqwv8fL8P8bt8Xd4P8 ToaGEOWDi74fA==
Received: from [IPv6:2601:152:4400:437c:4d93:59c1:b95c:c103] ([IPv6:2601:152:4400:437c:4d93:59c1:b95c:c103]) by resomta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPSA id n6lBhtqgARGBjn6lChaulZ; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 19:35:42 +0000
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=0;st=legit
Subject: Re: [Rsoc] RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <9817BB4B-D828-4128-A70C-A8B966E6642F@encrypted.net> <C2886BEB-D60F-4C77-A48F-B5C7E0DBAE51@akamai.com> <2d1eba24-e175-d3cc-e260-6db5306dbeab@nostrum.com>
From: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <fb94838f-383b-30fe-a409-5ae814cd38c9@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 15:35:40 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2d1eba24-e175-d3cc-e260-6db5306dbeab@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/sdDeMTWIH9Adqzt1ArZASwdjU_w>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 19:35:45 -0000

On 7/15/2019 2:41 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
> On 7/15/19 9:29 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:
>> Can you summarize the changes between this RFP and the last one?  As 
>> I recall, the purpose for doing an early RFP was to revise the 
>> process (which presumably includes the RFP).  Or am I mistaken?
>
>
> With 18 months of lead-time, that was the plan. Removing 12 months 
> from the equation does have a planning impact.
>
> /a
>
Don't you mean 30 months of lead time?   And I assume there was some 
sort of genesis of a plan described in the minutes of the RSOC that 
described what you wanted to accomplish with  an RSE re-compete - 
perhaps your documented discussion could be shared with the rest of the 
IETF?

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email