IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work

Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net> Mon, 15 July 2019 15:05 UTC

Return-Path: <sbanks@encrypted.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6571112019F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jEyr1bCQ0hqY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aws.hosed.org (aws.hosed.org [50.16.104.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4BA4120199 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aws.hosed.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066C38001B; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 11:05:55 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aws.hosed.org
Received: from aws.hosed.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (aws.hosed.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UK00H9NcrAAu; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 11:05:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.211] (corelight.static.monkeybrains.net [208.90.215.182]) by aws.hosed.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A390C8001A; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 11:05:54 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
From: Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net>
In-Reply-To: <9817BB4B-D828-4128-A70C-A8B966E6642F@encrypted.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:05:53 -0700
Cc: RSOC <rsoc@iab.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6862AF86-D9A6-4EE6-94A9-6E4994004172@encrypted.net>
References: <9817BB4B-D828-4128-A70C-A8B966E6642F@encrypted.net>
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ptdRW2QAoXa0BKWSdFFskB71xes>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 15:05:59 -0000

Hi,
	To follow up, I wanted to touch base on the process we mention below. We understand that the community is still discussing larger process points, but the RSOC would like to collect feedback on the following SOW in parallel.  This will allow the RSOC to move quickly if the community concludes that running the process as described in RFC 6635 is the best choice for now. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks
Sarah


> On Jul 15, 2019, at 7:25 AM, Sarah B <sbanks@encrypted.net> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 	Attached is the RSE SOW intended for the upcoming RFP. You'll find it very much inline with the previous SOW we sent out as part of the RFP during the last iteration of this process. The RSOC is requesting community feedback, and would like to run a 4 week feedback period. That period starts today, July 15, and ends August 15, 2019. Please direct your feedback to the RSOC directly.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Sarah Banks, Chair
> on behalf of the RSOC
> 
> <RSE-SOW-2019.pdf>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email