Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Mon, 15 July 2019 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D069812013F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 11:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JP0YUtr14SUR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 11:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22b.google.com (mail-oi1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C39B12010F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 11:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id u15so13404845oiv.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 11:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=y1dlKZuHd1xY+x69q9ZaWyiIF0JePZ7o+YewTaNs2Es=; b=Vo3a1+iE+5jMkfutZSmzkwQ7OOWiH+mfS9MHt3KkNT2g2adYw8ehejbj2G+OG62ZxG bk+0ZjHcdKusFHFsRUZ/cJR2usxzOhaVhjuzdf3Eihm+VsDdpCORP7BX0+um/m96eDWI kRm8C7UQr639fQGaWD5LzhjPg78MJLxq3gRwNGs+slLv4rVZzspFidVKj22p+lJPCL3V Tc84iDhiBGfqcKaB355fbjAKjZzTRJ9kkFV1u0D7PVhf5z3lfYVKVrfZCZuzjCoJLFBU Et8fXorLFuSa6ONLU8DYRlhQ27Jeg6eUx6gLu3eehoxXOh1A4+KqaVSXFeUqV5iS/Us2 ooag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y1dlKZuHd1xY+x69q9ZaWyiIF0JePZ7o+YewTaNs2Es=; b=BccApWcSLqYZAPN+cADaIdCTRNuoAFwNwqUWw3o1fnLLENg4+L4jLYvKURNzazCFDE Gg9kKW358FcNKVS2W6GSiSIzAv3vWMrSx1EkzyA40FCjFY8tXrig4hjAP3XsRzXb1acZ e7K++ExEy5LhkS/qJvjI8ivbEysoCdn2S9Ie7Ocn0ftubbr1hDNZtEpPL6Il8s1+pBsp IAFINx/qO5LHyb+BT0fC8XU1ZSP9YBjI+AI4Oe9ElIqWvri0ohjlGx0KO7nLeHt/Tlho f6xQvf0SQU9VaVZc3ik+72MWpncSbr/h0ro7hCcZtbBsWl4xS/FnV0rE4HMsOerogttV MFDQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX3AGZ4MIr13IsDi+L0GDespZ0936Xkaa0y9I+m6cct9fwjbs+h sGtlRq4AGqpzZzQZnJnzdhuEwT5IKCrJwVbSUu0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxRNJCvG6DupK/DPvPfH+te7fi+iHVNCCQyTjItfhJYNctXfHYRdku6Vti8mhP0cRw+o0IKU44GB+0l/mJlS88=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:3a03:: with SMTP id h3mr12383841oia.169.1563213778246; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 11:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <9817BB4B-D828-4128-A70C-A8B966E6642F@encrypted.net>
In-Reply-To: <9817BB4B-D828-4128-A70C-A8B966E6642F@encrypted.net>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 14:02:42 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgRcGF80R_h5it_u7eGQrMjavpZ6_noEKb5vY5i1HqJYaA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
To: Sarah B <sbanks@encrypted.net>
Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>, RSOC <rsoc@iab.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f5f203058dbc1116"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/PWN7zFmlgvDYvOGeuX-s3IGsxNM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 18:03:02 -0000

Hi Sarah,

Thanks for posting this document for comment.  My feedback is below.  To be
clear, I am reviewing this de novo, without regard to previous versions.

--Richard

=====

Overall, this document seems odd for an SOW.  The point of an SOW is to
state what the contractor must do in order to fulfill their end of the
contract.  This document contains a lot of text that irrelevant to that
point, and is vague on the details of what is actually to be done.  Going
through the document in more detail...


> Contractor will also be required to attend three annual IETF meetings...

This seems overly specific.  Would we find the RSE in breach of their
contract if they had to miss an IETF meeting?  Even if the answer is "it
depends", this should be softened.


> CONTRACT PERIOD

This is irrelevant to the SOW.  It should be specified elsewhere in the
contract.


> REPORTING RELATIONSHIPS

If I were bidding on this, I would find this section terrifyingly vague.  I
would want to know at least:

* What are my obligations to the RSOC?  Do I need to provide them
reporting, or attend meetings, or...?  Otherwise, they could tell the
contracting organization that I'm non-compliant for any reason.

* What are my powers with regard to the RPC and RFC Publisher?  I can't
"manage" them if I don't have any control over them, and again, I don't
want to be found in breach because I'm not doing something I wasn't
empowered to do.


> Operational Oversight Areas
> Policy Development Areas

I don't have the time at the moment to comment on these in detail, but
again, if I were bidding, I would be concerned about the vagueness here.
How am I supposed to know if I'm, for example, "Ensuri[ing] the ongoing
improvement rfc-editor.org" to sufficient degree?  What does it mean to
"serve as the primary representative of the RFC Series"?


> EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE REQUIRED
> SKILLS AND ABILITIES REQUIRED

These do not belong in the SOW, they belong in the RFP.  Once the SOW
enters into force, it doesn't matter what these sections say, since the
selection will have been made.  I also note that these are already in RFC
6635.

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 10:26 AM Sarah B <sbanks@encrypted.net> wrote:

> Hello,
>         Attached is the RSE SOW intended for the upcoming RFP. You'll find
> it very much inline with the previous SOW we sent out as part of the RFP
> during the last iteration of this process. The RSOC is requesting community
> feedback, and would like to run a 4 week feedback period. That period
> starts today, July 15, and ends August 15, 2019. Please direct your
> feedback to the RSOC directly.
>
> Kind regards,
> Sarah Banks, Chair
> on behalf of the RSOC
>
>