Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> Mon, 29 July 2019 20:48 UTC
Return-Path: <mstjohns@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D93312008B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7a22Zl-ugOaY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B29B120074 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-15v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.111]) by resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id sBXwho6H6c9cbsCYyh4zgH; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:48:08 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=20190202a; t=1564433288; bh=J7D7NkJcp/4rKGtf0vA0z12YnhfpiqDhSAgR6c5Vk6E=; h=Received:Received:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=iZnL5Vz9zndvzTL8BT1ZSz6Q4PMuQuSbQSfpJxxfcEd2Y85sgxSO1jr5GA4xE1F4B kNYW2s3hnmtrppoFAAaMkLzcPbC/t5/Zi9my8l7FtVSTdrdw+9iAes9pghTOpFrBlZ Mxp7hCbfig34JzRBT6bGH0+I2Ire6goKSRH81L+IP+OJo2tdSLTm4LmaCGWBp72xfG h3A2yR5mXWx6UhxC362X6i3fcTXp2lgfbn6T0Ee1QKhXpwZ+rNCjzTk/ICobMSV1O9 UzNCbCOCt92iZvor3QM8PPlIzl+BXK2JqArOxdJYbA5BiDuiHBcNu3HPcIi83vEQ/y W9YsSHIkl8JLg==
Received: from [IPv6:2601:152:4400:437c:75b8:7e7e:f605:bffb] ([IPv6:2601:152:4400:437c:75b8:7e7e:f605:bffb]) by resomta-ch2-15v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPSA id sCYxhGJlG28YJsCYxhucum; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:48:08 +0000
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=0;st=legit
Subject: Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <9817BB4B-D828-4128-A70C-A8B966E6642F@encrypted.net> <CAL02cgRcGF80R_h5it_u7eGQrMjavpZ6_noEKb5vY5i1HqJYaA@mail.gmail.com> <7e82f47a-6a1d-8d3e-b183-e5159a071481@gmail.com> <9f7e969e-0374-2f9f-4ec6-e2d85a2fb819@gmail.com> <B027130E-8357-44C7-AAAF-FA11C249FD92@isi.edu> <F6C97564-6DD6-47A2-A9E6-5401F50BE4D5@cable.comcast.com> <ce36b799-80e3-7eaa-576b-c7137793f115@cs.tcd.ie> <21882.1564430860@localhost>
From: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <8ce5bf75-7040-4b6c-32fc-0042cc6dbfc2@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:48:07 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <21882.1564430860@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/PrmH7Utqt0K59g9mrZVaIk5-274>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:48:11 -0000
On 7/29/2019 4:07 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: > Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > >> [JL] If this is the case, I wonder if it much matters to the community > >> whether the role is an employee (full or part time) or a contractor > >> (full or part time)? > > > For reasons stated earlier on the iasa2 list and as I stated at > > the plenary during open mic, I remain opposed to the idea of an > > employee-RSE. It does seem to keep being suggested, but that won't > > IMO make it a better idea;-) > > Are you opposed to the "clerical" issue of how the person is paid, > or are you opposed to the person being hired by interview rather than RFP? > Practical: 1) The general LOE for the RSE according to RFC6635 is 20 hours a week. It's difficult to be just a part-time employee as a salaried worker for various reasons including benefits, and the general assumption that if you're working for company A, you're not working for company B. Throw in the need to do full time weeks 3-5 times a year for the RSE (IETF and various retreats or other meetings) and that time has to be taken from other employers and you get into some messy situations. 2) The employing organization (e.g. the LLC) doesn't really have the size to be able to handle traditional employees. Even the ED hire is going to be interesting. Think about payroll, HR, benefits, etc. Then think about the need for some manager. You could make it the LLC under an "employee with a contract model" and assign them to the LLC to manage, but there would still be a lot of things to work out. Then there's "advancement" or the lack thereof. For Ray, we punted - he was really a contracted for employee by the IAOC of a larger company (ISOC) as far as I can tell. And placing the RSE under the ED is pretty much a recipe for failure for oh so many reasons. 3) Stephen's other note (surprising to me) about life tenure after a period of time in certain companies. I don't think we want to limit our selection to countries where this isn't the law. Relational: 1) This is a senior person who really should be co-equal with the IAB and IESG. Contracts at least allow for some specification of relationships between these three entities without screwing up supremacy issues in each of the entities bailiwick. I would expect the next contract to be rather restrictive on who gets to give direction to the RSE. 2) We haven't any one who could actually be a manager respected (in terms of the ability to actually provide value add in managing someone who knows more about publishing than the putative manager) by a good candidate for the RSE position. Obvious: 1) Publishing is not in any way a core competency of the IETF.
- RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Sarah B
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Salz, Rich
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Sarah Banks
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Sarah Banks
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Leif Johansson
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Richard Barnes
- Re: [Rsoc] RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of W… Adam Roach
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Salz, Rich
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Sarah Banks
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work heather flanagan
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Paul Hoffman
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Keith Moore
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Leif Johansson
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Keith Moore
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Richard Barnes
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Leif Johansson
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Keith Moore
- Re: [Rsoc] RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of W… Michael StJohns
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Nico Williams
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work S Moonesamy
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work John Levine
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Nico Williams
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Nevil Brownlee
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work John C Klensin
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Michael StJohns
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work John C Klensin
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work John C Klensin
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Leif Johansson
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Richard Barnes
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Bob Hinden
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Keith Moore
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work John C Klensin
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Salz, Rich
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Keith Moore
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work John C Klensin
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Michael Richardson
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work S Moonesamy
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Jari Arkko
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Rsoc] RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of W… Sarah Banks
- Re: [Rsoc] RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of W… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Rsoc] RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of W… Sarah Banks
- Re: [Rsoc] RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of W… S Moonesamy
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work John Wroclawski
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Bob Hinden
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Leif Johansson
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Richard Barnes
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Leif Johansson
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Richard Barnes
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Richard Barnes
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Livingood, Jason
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Stephen Farrell
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Ole Jacobsen
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Livingood, Jason
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Michael StJohns
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Keith Moore
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Wes Hardaker
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Joel M. Halpern
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Michael Richardson
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Michael Richardson
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Stephen Farrell
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Michael StJohns
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Alissa Cooper
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Michael StJohns
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Alissa Cooper
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Michael StJohns
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Randy Bush
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Michael StJohns
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Benjamin Kaduk
- Supervision under previous admin relationships (w… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Michael StJohns
- Re: Supervision under previous admin relationship… Michael StJohns
- Re: Supervision under previous admin relationship… Stephen Farrell
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Supervision under previous admin relationship… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Alissa Cooper
- Re: Supervision under previous admin relationship… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Supervision under previous admin relationship… John C Klensin
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work Benjamin Kaduk