Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 29 July 2019 20:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A413512006A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oQoF-wjeknB8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7DE912004E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A363808A; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:07:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D438EBDF; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:07:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
cc: RSOC <rsoc@iab.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
In-Reply-To: <ce36b799-80e3-7eaa-576b-c7137793f115@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <9817BB4B-D828-4128-A70C-A8B966E6642F@encrypted.net> <CAL02cgRcGF80R_h5it_u7eGQrMjavpZ6_noEKb5vY5i1HqJYaA@mail.gmail.com> <7e82f47a-6a1d-8d3e-b183-e5159a071481@gmail.com> <9f7e969e-0374-2f9f-4ec6-e2d85a2fb819@gmail.com> <B027130E-8357-44C7-AAAF-FA11C249FD92@isi.edu> <F6C97564-6DD6-47A2-A9E6-5401F50BE4D5@cable.comcast.com> <ce36b799-80e3-7eaa-576b-c7137793f115@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:07:40 -0400
Message-ID: <21882.1564430860@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/mU6A9C_4RUAS3egPiXFicb2kVs0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:07:44 -0000

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
    >> [JL] If this is the case, I wonder if it much matters to the community
    >> whether the role is an employee (full or part time) or a contractor
    >> (full or part time)?
    
    > For reasons stated earlier on the iasa2 list and as I stated at
    > the plenary during open mic, I remain opposed to the idea of an
    > employee-RSE. It does seem to keep being suggested, but that won't
    > IMO make it a better idea;-)

Are you opposed to the "clerical" issue of how the person is paid,
or are you opposed to the person being hired by interview rather than RFP?

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [