Re: [Rsoc] RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 23 July 2019 10:11 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED84012018C; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 03:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=2ZzCzvp+; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=eHOXPQ1s
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48_1Owy_pk-B; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 03:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042E5120025; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 03:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.189.201]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x6NAB6na024544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 03:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1563876681; x=1563963081; bh=32tt1USexo/ZB6Gft8JwhTgA1b0GcPQaPkTGlcwXIok=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=2ZzCzvp+QF1aFUGHK3LMDyKRaykp+Ab1+AjiGH4UkD3FMQe4hVXyY+bjYoveh2PfG 3Vp9QzSxXPtVsf+7+iKsdz4HZgtak/co3Uk6ZtiQCerNQCiiwCV1Lu1J13iNmMLB0N EkMErveWJvpZi5EmT5WH2Cah7atEPp/KXklarEDY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1563876681; x=1563963081; i=@elandsys.com; bh=32tt1USexo/ZB6Gft8JwhTgA1b0GcPQaPkTGlcwXIok=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=eHOXPQ1sqFKYXsVXgS4tJLAZjZywVcyDRpghg7Q+ScP7OBccytCDe/q+NyIXUWl3W uFWQ3Eg0zMBwFLXMu2ZMFK9Rmkbgy9dQOiVvxh9BjTd40EQaGN8K1MJ0vOFmk14d+B mxJjrlXfH/Is9xGaiIyeJ1+INnT6Tma9JBL/9kLY=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190723002458.0cd78150@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:28:27 -0700
To: Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: [Rsoc] RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
Cc: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, rsoc@iab.org
In-Reply-To: <577569C8-284F-4232-AF50-DD6F07F92EA2@encrypted.net>
References: <9817BB4B-D828-4128-A70C-A8B966E6642F@encrypted.net> <CAL02cgRcGF80R_h5it_u7eGQrMjavpZ6_noEKb5vY5i1HqJYaA@mail.gmail.com> <7e82f47a-6a1d-8d3e-b183-e5159a071481@gmail.com> <9f7e969e-0374-2f9f-4ec6-e2d85a2fb819@gmail.com> <CAL02cgSj4VcKsxawO140yNqAEtk==-Ek9=kvntvTb401BRrhYQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190722140432.13b71028@elandnews.com> <577569C8-284F-4232-AF50-DD6F07F92EA2@encrypted.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/8a4vMB28g1TUdXZg_c_SyftADe8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 10:11:25 -0000

Hi Sarah,
At 05:18 PM 22-07-2019, Sarah Banks wrote:
>    Considering the vast amount of email that I've been swimming in, 
> it seems I missed an email. I could go searching, but to expedite, 
> help me understand what your ask was for, again?

I asked for the information which the initial RFC Series Oversight 
Committee (RSOC) gathered from the previous RSE hiring exercise.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy