IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Fri, 26 July 2019 12:30 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FA912029A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 05:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fHYP7STlWU3m for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 05:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x336.google.com (mail-ot1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EC29120271 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 05:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x336.google.com with SMTP id l15so55142687otn.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 05:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BHtPVvEWAhO7LWUJ8zVQEAfrleMY/2NEgZnj5QEXVec=; b=bWUkYwE9IvpubZfxh/ipmBrM9KK1KHfeNbafGZ76isJqfXltWC7ZsnvWJb0vDDKjpb 0mDxLZ5jKkkFvgV32K3X0LV8l03poh8/SU2rJJqR1A9nJOvNkPPWa1vjQSKQ1387xazD mPtBfCZYkkDpWaMwDpc1dLbhFCggEekejVoHFZrOgZuHr9sLyamcMlB6GK3+N4BwxAMw WLVn7z5cQR35Y/Aku3HuvR8s5XKbFUrVXm2HehzDa1AjM/5YNERpqKqZjwJPvgety2r7 e9JOsiNFzT3NYQQyB0dmjlvMPgZXXXi5yjaW1sUH/8xfcbb73A2Vf7BVW41/FV6JSaoy oKOw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BHtPVvEWAhO7LWUJ8zVQEAfrleMY/2NEgZnj5QEXVec=; b=C/LfmWbenhldTFkm7PXOqc/ZmSi/pO/3nFp4oufnrNFo3UIIfQyiqCpDaDd4TfO7o2 EBku/w90nNBk/4UMY/hBRrEYQ5UZIyIuwp6xixJ13FGS8Ufy42GKanyYdLmVMX58f5Oi 9DjUpiliPAn028+1ljIAU04M++vwHP4zESOwi4XjLqCgQdunyXaCIwcY7eFDxYSIaCDi J/4ZfeOt/7Xqsd3GCebGKUEyscxHqT+teCPZ5DcuXjat1hRnfIVv6geFCOMBCaycS8yK gR01GWVkucIr58PCanJXVMPRhvozdRbBetEHSEOUPDWcTzjA6/Fnz5K6uHIACw55mQgj /f+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWifMOJseCkZy1AqLMhFCqEqrVDo8kQOnzX11t6wYRorDD3mmx5 EdGkihS31LkbYlL0ucdJRvG/8QUyGzVe3yoVwlo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwc5fNqwAq0WedfbQpLGwRm4zlZL/Xk0mruBGV4J1UBDRCNxEzTQ+NwbKS9bPmCWVvOj3alle1lnth2WUqR4gU=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:390:: with SMTP id f16mr14698731otf.93.1564144256318; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 05:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <9817BB4B-D828-4128-A70C-A8B966E6642F@encrypted.net> <CAL02cgRcGF80R_h5it_u7eGQrMjavpZ6_noEKb5vY5i1HqJYaA@mail.gmail.com> <7e82f47a-6a1d-8d3e-b183-e5159a071481@gmail.com> <9f7e969e-0374-2f9f-4ec6-e2d85a2fb819@gmail.com> <B027130E-8357-44C7-AAAF-FA11C249FD92@isi.edu> <90BEE571-76F4-4294-8DFE-CD89BCAF0529@gmail.com> <341ed6e9-043d-91a5-d1b6-ef36b1f9cc63@mnt.se>
In-Reply-To: <341ed6e9-043d-91a5-d1b6-ef36b1f9cc63@mnt.se>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 08:30:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgThuOxUKeDSz-a9eo9+KBj1_OAk8W=_x=qUSMrKXSyvrw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c68edd058e94b60a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/nP-25je2rRy80HN9TkG_Q-0tZ7g>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 12:30:59 -0000

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 00:05 Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> wrote:

>
> > I completely agree.  This should be treated as a search, not writing an
> RFP and see who applies.
>
> Thats absolutely right - people & community over process!


This seems ironic, given how focused this thread has been on process.  The
process (RFP vs search) doesn’t matter — either way we need to get the best
person for the role.

To put it in contrast to Klensin’s comment at the plenary — just because
someone is engaged as a contractor doesn’t make them a bag of nails.

—Richard

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email