Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 18 April 2014 23:24 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348791A04F6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 16:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.172
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.172 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yK1jHGxR7p9r for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 16:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377651A0484 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 16:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1WbI90-0004yh-QW; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 23:24:31 +0000
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 08:24:29 +0900
Message-ID: <m2zjjiuspe.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
In-Reply-To: <20140418230324.GB6166@thunk.org>
References: <5349AE35.2000908@meetinghouse.net> <5349BCDA.7080701@gmail.com> <01P6L9JZF5SC00004W@mauve.mrochek.com> <CAL0qLwZr=wVX6eD+yGVOaxkSy5fJbuAErTshOG+2BywUvkDfAA@mail.gmail.com> <01P6QCMYYMJ000004W@mauve.mrochek.com> <6EF4DECC078B08C89F163155@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <01P6QVVGQA4W00004W@mauve.mrochek.com> <5350A9FB.9010307@dougbarton.us> <01P6S93XQ9TI00004W@mauve.mrochek.com> <5351A89D.7000700@dougbarton.us> <20140418230324.GB6166@thunk.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/MfpnyOUUS3HD4K1b2GHGhp79vyk
Cc: IETF Disgust <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 23:24:37 -0000

> ... and then the operators should not be surprised if the people
> modifying the MLM software do something which is best for them, and
> which not necessarily best for the interest of the users of certain
> operators.
> 
> Which is the default when neither side is willing compromise, and
> everyone is reduced to taking unilateral action.
> 
> If you want to call that a failure of the standards process, I can
> only agree.

it is a failure of the internet and internet operations.  the failure
of the standards process just enables an excuse.

randy