Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
Lloyd W <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk> Sun, 31 October 2021 00:23 UTC
Return-Path: <eclipticplane2002@yahoo.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2887E3A1547 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 17:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.866
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.866 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SoEIe2nlpg_z for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 17:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonic310-12.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (sonic310-12.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [77.238.177.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67C283A1548 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 17:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1635639798; bh=2rZfz1XcEzo5mSSPhrKWdwIsjD0/o2Eurzfv8SNEaaA=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Cc:Date:References:To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=hFT/7X+Kj86zbGtyqKCM5IqbeWqHc16Aw04cyUXMFnKwRe9nlL41gfDfqaFNf8RySdkPJvKedf30YhJ2x3rMog9hAEkvs796iyTAIiHcRT99s3T2rcJ1eJ8fxW74MmENobC0ThWhc89Qc5bjIY3vYEZ1bBVEnKSUpUW6YpT9Zxl7Orj3aO5iIndQbsbjL/eFF33F2czIWI1ADVmRl01ZIwNIdp6ztwYnd9eAQ49mlmORPbly+LlsJBnUzLt3v7wE94FSDNSqdQET7PNL4UlHHE43ibohcEHaKix/ztchQkXMqj7ZOoH3EUNGzeNi7WCQ+lI3O9ZFnjh0s8JzC7MMwg==
X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1635639798; bh=YlyHbXQcVN0n7cmEHRh98BJgtM0ImZtcmuys773f6OA=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Subject:From:Date:To:From:Subject; b=Lps89YQHvTlKiOU3X36XtAvS52lyw8BmM4BSS0WWRKfwI9WcE4tzbJZi1k7sB3vzQcs2OTfydHXB7jqehsbAio2k53QKZm93LPxx+HLns42c+sG+vbF0ZuhWpjadWegyrw9cIY7e8a5IRopM6KKuzMgMr8tYDSrnpD3Wdwd3HDTsbnHaAu13sbu92P+9w7tjQz4ox+Id4UxuxgfLR1H4XqjHvrXZn5+4SQjIM3A+LfUio1J80emZ2qJkByGlrHDpdi/W73po/xd34EDCP2cRkCV2SqD/RAJm0vGTVMF/SsaDWODjDNrOqljtpbESYUfrmX/fAmCVpO5ImutYaZUa7Q==
X-YMail-OSG: QhQi.MIVM1kyKT_e7oqqnHELyJ1BrucRr4uaGOsMgzf964A9pTqDsXpQl9ssvbu tF9tykCACufTvHz23VFI5z5m4I0UNuqxjAZsYv6OcPrQxSl9pteOKoZIQL_CPSOKS.2ljkY05g_7 GuBVlnohtKVsEBfxyKH5eJoR0HAWmdWhrqCpCGrcPB_qe1SQ3waBiQdQrDAPpj.dnsB94XunV5Ys IoEUbAsb8ZNOJjK4Pnv2j_Dayq.dBrPGr8.Nz7IMuepL0vz61Mh07..TApobNxTe6bEctZvxU0nQ nHcXT8cLhLwLLrE8xYMuSjJPEJTrN53EIxGcQmn7Qja_Q47KacMUDbgse2qPz0IIwfXwNlRMdJzr uS0CGRjqAfZorQj8dT4FTd0ZwJgK_8lNOxMY_XSj7aykHlK6KhO728m5.s57yVIu2jfE5MMVAMOq 6zVawvxW8m6.0qOQOyxQL9So7HlTq4A3G.Cbvsm6WWo9VLLcqMw_AYJdpdYRSMZFlnO11X7BiHbk PO7XmECqBQHbbAkfn75IfWKN_z9fMFWt263ACZtWLEaQLhyVdX619F8XVDAuk7f_zb4ubFGiF1QX L1XoNDmk1FE31XbWHoMrWVOuB9F7La7mudmu.91M.uMi1ykHJI0qnUgihkFlnpdh8FlbgmB._1M5 H1dhI3V69fTehecHPu_kDqWOHBnNsfObDJ7FiOtPs5mgWUNR7_VltVysSpo6akJknbxccrB.snhD wPZ.lER5yVd7P9ae27bUi1QE4Y6ro_C8Tvthysn6Bwzl.8ODl.tr19b9b_l27R4phBphTh11DcOI VrW.oLvMv84ukJrpolWuEifgD1kUKawIYkIzT22hVJxGGV6fo.aRYreWvrKm9uCAzdXKMFJg_ezx HnelQzuMm6RoctzIit1N0Sx8wEQi8.I6yJRUNbd9VzZkXdMutAF05_38q0ov5gspzHYvrCUyrbnA XlNE5nWWWRONBmSUPiReblCl5a1idicB9jq5TVzWJVOaGQMp2qUfvv0yRGRS2j0xCIcWK73hCun0 g8_.TM.zB1tVMT3yyWHQBWjz5nBD5W3prEk.VX9oH78ef0qHYPPZy5QLaq13fO_s_0PqmvyHVcIh qRAaG3tetRLps5Y3fPBAJ7zE7RHTqbRSYst4hgRtBsKUfoVOzV2.luOkalRwpKwxOAEk2ANYw.wM Hw85QZs5.UqYjWiE3hfCI8FKTPnLMljUCQfJx5JPf71VVG5gmTbh_OCmNSvbHxII9FVw5K1RmCNw Ielsv0J9B0JGbWs9JTsSy3oXycpdpp._hzrx6cZ9rhUaIHNHlx6RHFDbeuc.owrTts0yyGaGiNOI 9WdrBRFschX54uwIGhW7wwfvzwIShiYth0e2dEmObhGCmTVRqOVDVIyHZZzTpnMJedKL6QvcRR4o HOKp_agm1NtmToxrScu5GwMBYhtvqlP0CjfCLyqIdTeXe5Q7zFvStFap_9b_a1Nm9Qg5etnjMVy2 j_TJa1V7uJ38LEGN7ybZZwv4ZZP4Lu31YN5Vc7Sezs5priT._15kgdW70FzjRT4AgMnHxHU7cEEr ARGfNFbBxigfCkAOwopk3VjFneW8qOUdgWsYJxkABtuM5AXcW7bEwjgWJkeNQfMlTrHR8i.AqdNz cJFOrvfGIWlAS_61B0Zs.aoIjYlQwW5eL2jyNewR7gqnNAgPpMn0jzifkhpU6ZPB3qQdnbuCovjc njPVk0wPFk6FcttSyjRaosJkQL_T9iAwHmaevoeWHVVudBsyQeVYrGTX_vt2W1DwmW6TcAS0HqOS DcmmYYx_tc1v1G15jyrlBcqvRYdqoMAKosLMTIWAnb8OowwQM.QrzohbtkBv6wc16ZAcvfMDXoJg POh9ifFc9Zk7_.2qCkejZbcGRWaCRu2Y8OZB2Sn3GQ0s43pMgL6dVNN9kgZbfxNezPtjt8yXyrqN X6Fy2qTb_bOyxyoZTzdlakw4KbIel1tbbc2NuWZcP3a5El_zk2sO2mlbE6Q2rYORWyt3MkEHuuXy z4luYtQQaxTqjuN1BXF.PbEghH3VldQfmFEEGGbli5uw2BmbuSZLU5C_avUK0UgZjo3zwEVhNX4Z McfzYdueCnvOlpkyCRpPI9AEBQk7Y.gBnybb8LYov7NqmlVigy293Q_ZDtW3tB5K3jveNC9UIiY4 cNUO6pHw56zTfOtBH53J16xGQg7El1RyGiA9jLHE4aRjZ2jA6g9NuNy4VhlwCTVDAhbWn8ut3Nb_ AWJXkGNv5r3nTbRNST2yly86Qf7WlHghNtLWU4pkbo91o.Xfo2fUJNWNcYFiBG8isVWWP_A7h2vy 2nqVC7p.tn_ESylMo.Y4-
X-Sonic-MF: <eclipticplane2002@yahoo.co.uk>
Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic310.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 00:23:18 +0000
Received: by kubenode531.mail-prod1.omega.bf1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 411a44d0c7814daf5e3a7641713359b9; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 00:23:12 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-E9F31627-0960-4E64-BD62-6D86C03D87AC"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
From: Lloyd W <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <47db1859-8201-9f37-0efd-aa09f4b1379b@network-heretics.com>
Cc: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 11:23:09 +1100
Message-Id: <98F25285-BD71-49BB-9B7E-CEFF217183F7@yahoo.co.uk>
References: <47db1859-8201-9f37-0efd-aa09f4b1379b@network-heretics.com>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (18H17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/TmH_62FBqvLmiStoOHnOtq1qiF4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 00:23:26 -0000
> On 31 Oct 2021, at 09:32, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> wrote: > It's hard to escape the impression that some of those insisting on "professional behavior" are looking for a way to exclude those who they deem not qualified, so as to get out of the way of the Big Corporations who want IETF to do what they want it to do. Absolutely. That's why I threw together http://lloydwood.users.sourceforge.net/Personal/L.Wood/publications/internet-drafts/README.html in my defence, because every so often I get asked to justify my worth and existence to some random corporate apparatchik of some random company who has decided that he (and it's always a he. women just don't do that whole 'you must justify your right to exist to me' thing) dislikes my participation in an IETF mailing list. And what justifies their participation in the IETF? Why, their employer! L. it's really all a bit "show me your papers".
- Re: [Gendispatch] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45b… Lloyd W
- Re: [Gendispatch] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45b… Lars Eggert
- Re: [Gendispatch] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45b… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Gendispatch] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45b… Bron Gondwana
- RE: [Gendispatch] Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45b… STARK, BARBARA H
- Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (… S Moonesamy
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Keith Moore
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Lloyd W
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Lloyd W
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Keith Moore
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Sander Steffann
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… S Moonesamy
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Keith Moore
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Lloyd W
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Keith Moore
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Lloyd W
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Keith Moore
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Miles Fidelman
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… S Moonesamy
- "professional" in an IETF context Keith Moore
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… S Moonesamy
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Brian E Carpenter
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Keith Moore
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Stephen Farrell
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context David Farmer
- RE: "professional" in an IETF context Andrew Campling
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Keith Moore
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Jay Daley
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Stephen Farrell
- RE: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Masataka Ohta
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Miles Fidelman
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Miles Fidelman
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Masataka Ohta
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Joel M. Halpern
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Masataka Ohta
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Stewart Bryant
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Keith Moore
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Keith Moore
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Miles Fidelman
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Miles Fidelman
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Miles Fidelman
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Brian E Carpenter
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Stewart Bryant
- It's a trap (Re: "professional" in an IETF contex… Carsten Bormann
- Relitigating history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Scott Bradner
- Re: It's a trap (Re: "professional" in an IETF co… Lloyd W
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Miles Fidelman
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Masataka Ohta
- RE: "professional" in an IETF context Vasilenko Eduard
- interface ID (was Re: "professional" in an IETF c… Masataka Ohta
- Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IETF c… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Scott O. Bradner
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… tom petch
- RE: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: Ancient history (was Accurate history was [Re… Eliot Lear
- Re: Ancient history (was Accurate history was [Re… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Bron Gondwana
- RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Ancient history (was Accurate … Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: "professional" in an IETF context Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: "professional" in an IETF context Vasilenko Eduard
- RE: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… tom petch
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Keith Moore
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Greg Shepherd
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Nick Hilliard
- RE: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Vasilenko Eduard
- RE: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Keith Moore
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Bron Gondwana
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Bron Gondwana
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Scott Bradner
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… otroan
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Nick Hilliard
- RE: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Nick Hilliard
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Stewart Bryant
- Why IPv6 failed [Re: Accurate history [Re: "profe… otroan
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… S Moonesamy
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… S Moonesamy
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… S Moonesamy
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Geoff Huston
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Erik Kline
- RE: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: Accurate history [Re: "professional" in an IE… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Keith Moore
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or n… ned+ietf