Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-03.txt

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Fri, 19 October 2018 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E7C130E9B for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 06:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CiYlozFgepge for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 06:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6E34130EE4 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 06:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2F87FB0; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:20:42 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1539955242; bh=eeysJm5RV3m6npccnf2w+oxAMcjX8S2HmbOg3bGJYAA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=B87C4RK+qYdo0/7x2NXdrw8CMzJEcy8OO1Pfcw+rMmdKOpCo2zqUdZlBEkBv+Qe2B ABan07e15JuS0CNE4Td7HgiRd6G+VrpDZ1NUIM5lumj3q+Q9bfyU3fH2cbbggSKbcH qQVegPun+6euQrT2w0uiYcL45l5iu0YAfbHZ7LCg=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D979AF; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:20:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:20:42 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-03.txt
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BASO_ByzbanhLKnWV280O_fASd-8W+ujpj3sN6d2-whw2w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1810191519100.26856@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <153973137181.9473.10666616544238076833@ietfa.amsl.com> <092346e1-6350-e54e-e711-9c5ee6dc4e6b@gmail.com> <CAFU7BASO_ByzbanhLKnWV280O_fASd-8W+ujpj3sN6d2-whw2w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/9YMdR1Ji5Ju4vZhtICcWiyM6mkU>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 13:20:50 -0000

On Fri, 19 Oct 2018, Jen Linkova wrote:

> Other thing: it looks like there is a real need to implement IPv6 
> security even on v4-only networks. Sounds like v6ops-scope draft (or 
> maybe there is one? I'm happy to craft smth if it does not exist).

https://securityblog.switch.ch/2014/08/26/ipv6-insecurities-on-ipv4-only-networks/

That article from 2014 talks about exactly that. I'm sure there are more.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se