Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-03.txt

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Sat, 20 October 2018 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <job@ntt.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545FF130DC1 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 11:06:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2fQ6BziYAmXO for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 11:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net (mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net [IPv6:2001:418:3ff:3::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FD1F12426A for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 11:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <job@ntt.net>) id 1gDvdt-000EbB-6R (job@us.ntt.net) for ipv6@ietf.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 18:06:29 +0000
Received: by mail-ot1-f49.google.com with SMTP id q50so36299826otd.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 11:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoiAPR1alCfn0BEY7Z8mqECYIXzM4ExzdNjjeREzgKUv0fTLTzyC POfhtmOb+1NWocLnquYvuwznckceRJBEjjWDVMOnsg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62uQJzPE4iqHW1E8wWxY5tTUekHgZXG4pavwMILXXH1bUBjb1VHwZG4gpDzJpv/q6DxP6RyCeh7+PfnPLROwDU=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1c8e:: with SMTP id l14mr26551827ota.125.1540058786561; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 11:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFU7BASO_ByzbanhLKnWV280O_fASd-8W+ujpj3sN6d2-whw2w@mail.gmail.com> <CACWOCC-u7aAPwAOcixYvt2On=-o_8X25GhqdXTfA+tWRC1o2XA@mail.gmail.com> <3beca72e-19c5-10af-02e5-c21a90d77100@gmail.com> <20181019.223739.271916573.sthaug@nethelp.no> <4f58643c-272e-507e-3282-c87befd42395@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4f58643c-272e-507e-3282-c87befd42395@gmail.com>
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 20:06:15 +0200
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACWOCC8nmqMvP1J5zL=maDct1pPx96DyWQQ5S5FSjF9G-sRNrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACWOCC8nmqMvP1J5zL=maDct1pPx96DyWQQ5S5FSjF9G-sRNrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-03.txt
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, job@ntt.net, sthaug@nethelp.no
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e819270578ace01f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/R6pd3_bvzca8CKOi4CgPcUQf7oM>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 18:06:31 -0000

On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 3:42 Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> In other words: if this is what you want for ipv6only-flag, then
> I'd like the same rule for all the other draft-ietf-6man documents
> from now on, please.



Yes please! I’d love to see more working groups require multiple
interoperable implementations (like IDR does) before documents advance to
publication. I believe this will improve the working group’s output.

Kind regards,

Job

Ps. I brought this topic up for this draft because the discussion around it
shows me there is some controversy, which perhaps can be resolves by
demonstrating the concept in running code.