Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-03.txt

[Ole Troan <[e-mail]>]

Hi Nick,

> Brian E Carpenter wrote on 17/10/2018 03:39:
>> We've attempted in this version to respond to the comments received during WGLC.
>> The most important change is this:
>>       *  Reorganized text about problem statement and applicability
>> We hope the new text makes it clear how the solution relates to other
>> solutions (layer 2 filtering or using a DHCPv4 option).
>> There are a number of other changes:
>>       *  Added note about shortage of flag bits
>>       *  Clarified text about logging configuration error in Section 6
>>       *  Editorial changes.
> 
> Brian
> 
> -03 polishes some peripheral stuff but doesn't substantially address any of the issues I've brought up over the last couple of months.
> 
> Chairs: none the issues I've raised previously have been substantially addressed in this revision.  Do we need to go through all these issues again, individually, on the mailing list for them to be considered as outstanding in this draft?

If you believe there are comments within the scope of the draft that hasn’t been addressed I suggest you bring them back to the list. 

If there are several I can set up an issue tracker for this draft. 

Cheers 
Ole