IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-03.txt

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Fri, 19 October 2018 21:55 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380A1130E50 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 14:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y6WcxhhIjjKC for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 14:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CE85130E10 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 14:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id u197-v6so27953107oif.5 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 14:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fdvjEqbz7YWdJ7VOhjDAh7/kHCqkah/UMe150iu9RlI=; b=ODED5spxOVfPSMR+zNFDLYgam+nBzfI7C0ufWNVtzueHgrj9Tnvjui/9KB/f9RpNWd JwZPgP4lJxNC3SoCvkih56NbuO2+xaIdgGw/z2iQm4y0TNYB5ymtU4VwqB5z5C8IMHdU M7lQH8P1JVHCHIyTPUCky6DnDJnwxSAP9mnkyjimDkRokuWoSrxpu1+W4pXyvodSlONg vEoPlVVVDiCVE3S9NQc4bPeDlMyneDmCxFpI+LsWb2A0f0fgxykYoPgrBJdNf7oQ5GIx 80TWxC78JwNAHFmpuEcsSxT/ZrZYxcOD9Moc0XDCq1qo/s2Wnni4Imui0QeWUz3PMGTw AFyg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fdvjEqbz7YWdJ7VOhjDAh7/kHCqkah/UMe150iu9RlI=; b=ZSlCw/e0qF62gzn4gCDm+PDj0xKqA3bqKmVFyMW1dJWv2XRQlc4rOVEzOsxdoreW2f tfxyRqiluPuH+YY7h+2HJcI1ZUWrkSHUOLGmvxm9P9gK5P1fm4B6JDzHfg0J50MgLpJR rXpNT3lS89uyNMVSwADqWvJmMlYkNYSj7xcbG5yupstzwu3MLebxjITMj9eHdE9St764 fbB5J2UegJcWQzp9zLOgv8uRWKOEOolnYv0lrxLGW49Wyp/3C4sJl2AECL6cM513io2I EKrBJz2HFQXDA5eqyyRTe4vuNFgUDd7h83FXUpPGz45tedpr6BUA+YDUuzGco92c14b2 JoSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoha22fG7R0EmI4H23RSMAI4AHYfbwJ0bcTe2s8gKXmdn1V57iwF ZsFCkaSN5+LcUhbIiMbY7/Fz31ME6qrHgmaYeV4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63AQ6qEUpWzZ3AVd7oHKZW8WKBx8H8YVz/x/gQuz6pGFvvFWsBRhq3bVah9LGBg385cRg0lKZKZ8DqCntl0gjo=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:e447:: with SMTP id b68-v6mr19995218oih.60.1539986122834; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 14:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFU7BASO_ByzbanhLKnWV280O_fASd-8W+ujpj3sN6d2-whw2w@mail.gmail.com> <CACWOCC-u7aAPwAOcixYvt2On=-o_8X25GhqdXTfA+tWRC1o2XA@mail.gmail.com> <3beca72e-19c5-10af-02e5-c21a90d77100@gmail.com> <20181019.223739.271916573.sthaug@nethelp.no>
In-Reply-To: <20181019.223739.271916573.sthaug@nethelp.no>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 08:55:11 +1100
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2z3zMcQSG2QpEhKByRr73BnEFC7xwayHe7p86TQpUvQYg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-03.txt
To: sthaug@nethelp.no
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cf877705789bf585"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/AfOKXKhBeZByYsOZusoYxkZXJOo>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:55:25 -0000

On Sat., 20 Oct. 2018, 7:38 am , <sthaug@nethelp.no> wrote:

> > Job,
> > On 2018-10-20 01:35, Job Snijders wrote:
> >> I think it would be good to have some running code before advancing
> this to
> >> IESG review and RFC publication.
> >
> > Why is this proposal special in that respect? This is not an IETF
> requirement
> > and despite the BCP advocating an Implementation Status section, very
> few drafts
> > do this.
> >
> > Note, I am all for some trial implementations, but why does *this* draft
> > need one when so many others don't?
>
> Whatever happened to "We believe in rough consensus and running code"?
>

It isn't "We require ..."




>          https://www.ietf.org/how/runningcode/
>
> That certainly *used* to be one of the big differences between the
> ISO/OSI standardization process and the Internet standardization
> process...
>
> Steinar Haug, AS2116
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email