Re: [ipwave] Hidden terminal problem

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Thu, 18 April 2019 02:43 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EAC120290; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 19:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1ZfQeCZ_qbip; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 19:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x233.google.com (mail-oi1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE851120088; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 19:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x233.google.com with SMTP id x188so416224oia.13; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 19:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=l3jxlmT0w9znLbS+JBKlgoAbsaxjmCmKhGXwv0d0C4E=; b=LmK/5J42Q/PDxr4cJ83ma1JsbBepBnGUr5Gy9fG8bxeCQMm5Otdle3tOTCk8LnoBjK NJDTGIH92KzQQcgDQFWrMCg0K9CoGIXb6mcw46UVt6YM0ctUiO0WpVLKX1AIvf73ITzI Prrg9/G9aWOGwzQaMes+frmpxWs8WQGMnZwz6qnaW4rdor5s7nf3ts4gBBarxb7lHyM+ PH7kfaou5/vOKbG1UuAea1hzoXjPjP+RGADpneRl8zny9poJRZqXGb4DZNaZrUBAutRH q6dJB8A7qyWRs9/eVgcqSS/i3O6tPBCwFyFYmlUH/P7+aYVJ5Xnk+j0ZQmm74AlDXDAW S4Hg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=l3jxlmT0w9znLbS+JBKlgoAbsaxjmCmKhGXwv0d0C4E=; b=qA9xgJrWjvE2HNHNQyVDHCFB3k4HkQGdc1usHpL9RTy4nlLAgY2IgCOe0vlKozWIHT Rmy2ZiW75BpfheKX6QcX+511wd5U3shwnJClUpGWn7U0sqzID+hJKZbWi/cZDZ/TdkkS EwAS1fSf+f5ca5uN8iHAjYs2K79Lo5r1nYN4dqwyQREIWFoXBMBvgOIOYjG1PCPw6Kpr ewvPRne68m5UauHq/wDExAEkwPvTZO6yVYmSKIsajVDz0FdNgqIL4zMUnAEDY/Z88PPp vBDxpuD3cvMvB/at3OwgAfNZ8gvUR1L1UPiH5jQH6tvLQWQFlpiUaySuFgaYPLUn76cB 3u+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWr955Kut9HJSR/X53Ojg3uuHfqvD6HT+RtsW+cTDMqXDyXBf1Y 16I4qDQLAwjcUCYOlyM988i4LfUhco9vLdQVuy4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxnIIVy20PPz3lXxxbe+i6kljmPHAGZK0aEsY4uJGe/6pAy4kRXrxKPnssoATCkcD0/hpbwA/qvewzyBNaBOKc=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:c687:: with SMTP id w129mr454846oif.134.1555555397249; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 19:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155169869045.5118.3508360720339540639@ietfa.amsl.com> <a8aad636-069c-4451-dbf1-72c1db2204ef@gmail.com> <CAD8vqFfx_FVi5NobrR1p6xEKjkSNa1_ZejgrEs3JPDHJQoxD7A@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB356570FDBC5798F155DDEE25D82C0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMugd_Xce5cWLtVB4DbR1ZEaFbdfiRpXre9oq61ukRC+n+3cZw@mail.gmail.com> <D8D5F0B7.2F2BB8%sgundave@cisco.com> <D8D5F510.2F2BC8%sgundave@cisco.com> <3e716b4b-8236-0488-309c-7cd3a54db7b5@gmail.com> <D8D7B1E7.2F2CA2%sgundave@cisco.com> <CAD8vqFfSGKhw_ou3VB98C8r1gq=4WD8+f8C5P53C46k-0V+XuA@mail.gmail.com> <66e7c810-45a5-5244-59dc-4b764b6fb346@gmail.com> <1a6599ee-88f9-42d9-a208-918ba6711612@gmail.com> <11645738-6f95-82e5-48f1-ebc3ce54423e@gmail.com> <6aaea808-6013-cd73-c894-c29fd8c98ac8@gmail.com> <72f60b2f-0a3a-8d60-f6de-09c058913c33@earthlink.net> <62a65ef0-43f2-648e-fe68-50f484d09ef1@gmail.com> <fe190caa-fa94-f398-6cf9-01a8f23e2e4f@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <fe190caa-fa94-f398-6cf9-01a8f23e2e4f@earthlink.net>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 04:43:01 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ89GYk=hRpxohaAgRvNTc30KDacX82OFyS5cbQugu043ew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
Cc: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org>, "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>, "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e1b2330586c4f692"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/d92Ua0wH9HqApv1AOJs0DuFNrPA>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Hidden terminal problem
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 02:43:20 -0000

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 5:50 PM Charlie Perkins <
charles.perkins@earthlink.net> wrote:

> Hello Alex,
>
> Consider the following three nodes with radio links as shown:
>
> A----------B----------C
>
> Suppose that A and B are at 80% of their signal range, and also that B
> and C are at 80% of their signal range.
>
> So A and C are not in range.  So A is 'hidden' from C, and C is 'hidden'
> from A.
>
> That's the hidden terminal problem.  It's not specific to OCB or WiFi,
> and it is not a hypothetical problem.  It's just physics. It's not at
> all difficult to understand, but it is very important to understand.
>

Yes but it has been reduced its effects of collisions by CSMA/CA, and by
using control frames,


>
> One question below...
>
> On 4/16/2019 3:18 AM, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
> >
> > ...
>
> >
> > I do not know how the hidden terminal problem works.  I feel like if I
> > start looking into it I will grow additional white hairs.  I feel like I
> > better avoid  it.
>

usually it is the IEEE problem to solve not this WG problem. I believe they
solved it.


> >
> > I think other people have some experience with the hidden terminal
> > problem in non-OCB WiFi and 802.15.4.  I am listening to them.
>

usually MIMO technology has change many issues, but 802.15.4 is big
different MAC than 802.11,

> >
> > I think nobody has any experience with the hidden terminal problem in
> > OCB settings.  I have some doubts, but still I think it is almost nobody.
> >
> >
> I find this very surprising!  What do others think?
>

I think usually this hidden terminal is old problem now IEEE802.11 has been
updated, solving many old problems including that. It is called now hidden
station in IEEE802.11 new docs. In old sunets and terminals they have no
intelligence but now the stations are smart especially when it is a Car not
a sensor, because a Car has big storage and power capabilities that can
help to increase intelligence and decision making.

AB


> Regards,
> Charlie P.
>
> _______________________________________________
> its mailing list
> its@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>