[Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field

"Doug Ewell" <dewell@adelphia.net> Tue, 10 October 2006 06:51 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXBSm-0001l6-RR; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 02:51:40 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXBSm-0001ks-1e for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 02:51:40 -0400
Received: from mta10.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.202]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXBSk-0003hi-P8 for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 02:51:40 -0400
Received: from DGBP7M81 ([68.67.66.131]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20061010065138.BWAF7818.mta10.adelphia.net@DGBP7M81> for <ltru@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 02:51:38 -0400
Message-ID: <005501c6ec38$89591c00$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81>
From: Doug Ewell <dewell@adelphia.net>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
References: <E1GX1Gr-0002h2-RI@megatron.ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:51:38 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Mark Davis <mark dot davis at icu dash project dot org> wrote:

> I think this is outside of the scope of the registry. Where will this 
> stop? Population of languages? Geographic area spoken? Population 
> density? .....

The proposal requires only what is present in the existing ISO/FDIS 
639-3 data files.

> The purpose of the registry is to distinguish one language from 
> another. No more, no less.

In that case, we should get rid of all script-suggestion mechanisms; 
those don't distinguish languages either.

I expressed my views in 
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg06035.html.  That 
is the last I'll have to say about it.  Martin has placed me in the 
correct column.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru