Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field

John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Tue, 10 October 2006 03:14 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GX84J-00012y-D0; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:14:11 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GX84H-00012t-PE for ltru@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:14:09 -0400
Received: from mercury.ccil.org ([192.190.237.100]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GX84G-0006gL-Ik for ltru@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:14:09 -0400
Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GX84F-0004QC-Bn; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:14:07 -0400
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:14:07 -0400
To: Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field
Message-ID: <20061010031407.GE31563@ccil.org>
References: <789E617C880666438EDEE30C2A3E8D10EF2F@mailsrvnt05.enet.sharplabs.com> <452AD980.8050301@yahoo-inc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <452AD980.8050301@yahoo-inc.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Cc: ltru@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Addison Phillips scripsit:

> I would support John's proposal fully if and only if it 
> distinguished collective and macro languages for use in the 
> registration process.

I have no problem with adding "macrolanguage" as an additional
type; it's a fine idea.  The information is technically redundant
(a language is a macrolanguage if and only if it appears in the
Prefix field of an extlang), but handy to have on the spot.

-- 
Take two turkeys, one goose, four               John Cowan
cabbages, but no duck, and mix them             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
together. After one taste, you'll duck          cowan@ccil.org
soup the rest of your life.
        --Groucho

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru