Re: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ? (was: Proposal: include new"Language-Type:" field)

John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Tue, 10 October 2006 18:22 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXMFZ-0003lC-7t; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:22:45 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXMFY-0003l5-4E for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:22:44 -0400
Received: from mercury.ccil.org ([192.190.237.100]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXMFV-0000mP-TA for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:22:44 -0400
Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GXMFT-00066V-1S; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:22:39 -0400
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:22:39 -0400
To: Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ? (was: Proposal: include new"Language-Type:" field)
Message-ID: <20061010182238.GF31563@ccil.org>
References: <F8ACB1B494D9734783AAB114D0CE68FE0B1B1999@RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <452BBE3E.1060100@yahoo-inc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <452BBE3E.1060100@yahoo-inc.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Cc: ltru@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Addison Phillips scripsit:

> I was hoping that 639-3 would provide the information on what is 
> or is not considered a macro-language. But this information isn't 
> it.

"Scope" means "individual language or macrolanguage".  You can
deduce from the registry which are which; a macrolanguage is one
that appears as the Prefix of some extlangs.

But I'm not against including this information at all.

-- 
John Cowan    http://ccil.org/~cowan    cowan@ccil.org
[T]here is a Darwinian explanation for the refusal to accept Darwin.
Given the very pessimistic conclusions about moral purpose to which his
theory drives us, and given the importance of a sense of moral purpose
in helping us cope with life, a refusal to believe Darwin's theory may
have important survival value. --Ian Johnston

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru