[Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?

Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Wed, 11 October 2006 02:09 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXTXe-0001MN-9M; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:09:54 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXTXd-0001MI-Kl for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:09:53 -0400
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXTXc-000487-BZ for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:09:53 -0400
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GXTXB-0006Aq-Ei for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 04:09:25 +0200
Received: from pd9fbad9d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.251.173.157]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 04:09:25 +0200
Received: from nobody by pd9fbad9d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 04:09:25 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ltru@lists.ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 04:07:44 +0200
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <452C51F0.681F@xyzzy.claranet.de>
References: <452B995B.92F@xyzzy.claranet.de> <F8ACB1B494D9734783AAB114D0CE68FE0B1B1999@RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <452BCBE9.56D0@xyzzy.claranet.de> <20061010182431.GG31563@ccil.org> <452BEB3E.1C58@xyzzy.claranet.de> <20061011013231.GB23580@ccil.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9fbad9d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (OS/2; U)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Cc:
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

John Cowan wrote:
 
> "Yrch" is in fact the Sindarin word for "orcs", the plural of "orch";
> not Black Speech at all.

Oops, I should read it again, I missed that, thanks.

>> In some cases like "aue" =/Kx'au//'ein or "gnk" //Gana I'm not sure
>> if that's as it should be, it appears to be odd.  Or maybe "//" has
>> a well-known meaning, and I just don't know what it is.
 
> /, //, and ! are letters representing various clicks in languages of
> South Africa and Namibia.

Is that ! related to u+01C3 ?  Then the others might be u+01C0..u+10C2.

Frank



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru