Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?

Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com> Wed, 11 October 2006 02:44 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXU4g-000179-I0; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:44:02 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXU4f-000174-JE for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:44:01 -0400
Received: from rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.228.150]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXU4e-00027m-8b for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:44:01 -0400
Received: from [10.72.72.163] (snvvpn1-10-72-72-c163.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.72.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.rout) with ESMTP id k9B2hicE071433 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dcbpIvJ5AcHt0c1OqgEMr6xUPprMOlOI/fp2aYKWfdnld1O+hzJPI6MLw1EbJk7V
Message-ID: <452C5A60.7010207@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:43:44 -0700
From: Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?
References: <452B995B.92F@xyzzy.claranet.de> <F8ACB1B494D9734783AAB114D0CE68FE0B1B1999@RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <452BCBE9.56D0@xyzzy.claranet.de> <20061010182431.GG31563@ccil.org> <452BEB3E.1C58@xyzzy.claranet.de> <20061011013231.GB23580@ccil.org> <452C51F0.681F@xyzzy.claranet.de>
In-Reply-To: <452C51F0.681F@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -15.0 (---------------)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Cc: ltru@lists.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org


Frank Ellermann wrote:
>> /, //, and ! are letters representing various clicks in languages of
>> South Africa and Namibia.
> 
> Is that ! related to u+01C3 ?  Then the others might be u+01C0..u+10C2.
> 

Exactly so. The Unicode characters represent the specific "click" 
characters from those languages and are distinct from the ASCII 
punctuation commonly used to transcribe those languages in the Latin script.

Addison

-- 
Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc.

Internationalization is an architecture.
It is not a feature.

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru