IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?

John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Tue, 10 October 2006 18:24 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXMHK-0004cw-2k; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:24:34 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXMHJ-0004cq-Gs for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:24:33 -0400
Received: from mercury.ccil.org ([192.190.237.100]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXMHI-00018Q-9j for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:24:33 -0400
Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GXMHH-0006Ba-8f; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:24:31 -0400
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:24:31 -0400
To: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?
Message-ID: <20061010182431.GG31563@ccil.org>
References: <452B995B.92F@xyzzy.claranet.de> <F8ACB1B494D9734783AAB114D0CE68FE0B1B1999@RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <452BCBE9.56D0@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <452BCBE9.56D0@xyzzy.claranet.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Cc: ltru@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Frank Ellermann scripsit:

> That doesn't explain "orq".  And the ethnologue site claims that
> "orq" is no SIL code.  So how did it get added to a 639-3 draft ?

Conlangs come from Language List.  If you go to
http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/documentation.asp?id=orq you can
see the link to the LL page.

That said, I think "orq" doesn't belong there: not a single
word is extant.

-- 
I don't know half of you half as well           John Cowan
as I should like, and I like less than half     cowan@ccil.org
of you half as well as you deserve.             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --Bilbo

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email