IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?

Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com> Wed, 11 October 2006 01:51 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXTFb-0001mk-K7; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:51:15 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXTFa-0001mV-1J for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:51:14 -0400
Received: from mailb.microsoft.com ([131.107.115.215] helo=smtp.microsoft.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXTFW-00040q-Oe for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:51:14 -0400
Received: from mailout5.microsoft.com (157.54.69.148) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.0.647.8; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:51:10 -0700
Received: from RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.61.148]) by mailout5.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2786); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:51:08 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:50:34 -0700
Message-ID: <F8ACB1B494D9734783AAB114D0CE68FE0B1B1C2F@RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20061011013231.GB23580@ccil.org>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?
thread-index: Acbs1StUIKApJ0YjRP2cAB9M5d+hTgAAZhvA
References: <452B995B.92F@xyzzy.claranet.de><F8ACB1B494D9734783AAB114D0CE68FE0B1B1999@RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com><452BCBE9.56D0@xyzzy.claranet.de> <20061010182431.GG31563@ccil.org><452BEB3E.1C58@xyzzy.claranet.de> <20061011013231.GB23580@ccil.org>
From: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
To: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>, Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Oct 2006 01:51:08.0865 (UTC) FILETIME=[B8C48B10:01C6ECD7]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Cc: Anderson, Deborah, Anthony Aristar <aristar@linguistlist.org>, ltru@lists.ietf.org, ISO639-3@sil.org
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan@ccil.org] 

> What's the right procedure for getting conlangs removed
> from the list, Peter?  639/RA-JAC?  Anthony Aristar?

If experts in constructed language feel there are entries in the draft
code table for 639-3 that do not warrant inclusion, it would probably be
best if they submitted feedback to Joan Spanne at the 639-3 RA
(ISO639-3@sil.org), and also to the relevant people connected with
Linguist List: Anthony Aristar (aristar@linguistlist.org) and Debbie
Anderson (dwanders@sonic.net).



Peter

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email