RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field
Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com> Thu, 05 October 2006 16:58 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVWXq-0007B2-Oz; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 12:58:02 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVWXn-00077t-Ur for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 12:57:59 -0400
Received: from maila.microsoft.com ([131.107.115.212] helo=smtp.microsoft.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVWXO-00085T-74 for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 12:57:59 -0400
Received: from mailout5.microsoft.com (157.54.69.148) by TK5-EXGWY-E801.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.0.647.8; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 09:57:34 -0700
Received: from RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.61.148]) by mailout5.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2725); Thu, 5 Oct 2006 09:57:32 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 09:57:07 -0700
Message-ID: <F8ACB1B494D9734783AAB114D0CE68FE0B1B1143@RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20061005125959.GA8062@ccil.org>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field
thread-index: AcbofjYQD584dEnhR5uIzCvgesoyIAAIPQJA
References: <004301c6e847$d0e3f440$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81><000801c6e858$9bc9af50$6500a8c0@chalmers95a69n> <20061005125959.GA8062@ccil.org>
From: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
To: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>, Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsson14@comhem.se>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Oct 2006 16:57:32.0765 (UTC) FILETIME=[599EA0D0:01C6E89F]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4d87d2aa806f79fed918a62e834505ca
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
I have proposed to the JAC that we remove "(other)" from any collections that have them. That is an open issue pending JAC discussion. Peter -----Original Message----- From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan@ccil.org] Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 6:00 AM To: Kent Karlsson Cc: 'LTRU Working Group' Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field Kent Karlsson scripsit: > In addition I would prefer to have "Deprecated: ..." for those of type > "Collection", on the grounds that they are "Collection"s, and indeed > the "(Other)" portion in many (most) of them does not make sense in > relation to 639-3. I thought about deprecating them, but if they are to be deprecated, it is in a sense quite different from the deprecation of 'CS' or 'he'. It's not that they are obsolete or nonsensical, but that they are vague. However, sometimes vagueness can't be avoided. The 639-2 codes came out of library practice, and sometimes the only thing you know about a document is that it's in some North American Indian language or other -- your records aren't complete. On the whole, then, I would rather label them as collections directly, and then say that using collection subtags is discouraged unless no better information is available. As for "(Other)", I hope to see its demise; it only makes sense on the assumption that 639-2 is a closed collection, which it has not been up to now. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan Rather than making ill-conceived suggestions for improvement based on uninformed guesses about established conventions in a field of study with which familiarity is limited, it is sometimes better to stick to merely observing the usage and listening to the explanations offered, inserting only questions as needed to fill in gaps in understanding. --Peter Constable _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
- [Ltru] Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" fie… John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Proposal: include new "Language-Type:"… Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Proposal: include new "Language-Type:"… Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Proposal: include new "Language-Type:"… John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Proposal: include new "Language-Type:"… Randy Presuhn
- RE: [Ltru] Proposal: include new "Language-Type:"… McDonald, Ira
- RE: [Ltru] Proposal: include new "Language-Type:"… Peter Constable
- [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:"… Doug Ewell
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Ty… Kent Karlsson
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Ty… Debbie Garside
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Ty… John Cowan
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Ty… Peter Constable
- [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:"… Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Ty… Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:"… Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:"… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Ty… Mark Davis
- [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:"… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Ty… Marion Gunn
- [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:"… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Ty… John Cowan
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Ty… McDonald, Ira
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Ty… Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Ty… John Cowan
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Ty… Peter Constable
- [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:"… Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:"… Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Ty… Marion Gunn
- [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ? (was: Proposal: include n… Frank Ellermann
- RE: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ? (was: Proposal: inclu… Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ? (was: Proposal: inclu… Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ? Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ? (was: Proposal: inclu… John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ? John Cowan
- RE: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ? (was: Proposal: inclu… Peter Constable
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ? Peter Constable
- [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ? Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ? Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ? Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ? Peter Constable
- RE: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ? Peter Constable
- [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ? Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ? John Cowan
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ? Peter Constable
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ? Peter Constable
- [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ? Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ? Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ? Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ? John Cowan
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ? Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ? Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ? Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ? John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ? Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ? Peter Constable