IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?

Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com> Wed, 11 October 2006 06:09 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXXHP-0000pB-Ni; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:09:23 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXXHN-0000oH-O6 for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:09:21 -0400
Received: from mailb.microsoft.com ([131.107.115.215] helo=smtp.microsoft.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXXGP-0003NW-An for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:08:24 -0400
Received: from mailout6.microsoft.com (157.54.69.150) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.0.647.8; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:08:18 -0700
Received: from RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.61.148]) by mailout6.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:08:17 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:01:54 -0700
Message-ID: <F8ACB1B494D9734783AAB114D0CE68FE0B1B1C80@RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <452C69E9.58B2@xyzzy.claranet.de>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?
thread-index: Acbs6NaK15M5s8tnR/GsA2+344QIHgAEUW1A
From: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
To: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>, ltru@lists.ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Oct 2006 06:08:17.0262 (UTC) FILETIME=[A4CF18E0:01C6ECFB]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Cc:
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

> From: Frank Ellermann [mailto:nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de]

> > there's no particular reason for members of this WG to be
> > second guessing whether the content of ISO 639-3 is good
> > enough for use in the LSR.
> 
> IBTD.  If it appears to list "anything" it would hurt the
> deployment of 4646bis. 

May I suggest that if one is willing to read the FDIS text, it would be reasonably clear that it doesn't aim to list "anything".


> The "interesting" types A, C, E, H, and S (what's H ?) 

The type "historic" refers to historical precursors to modern languages; e.g. Middle English.



Peter

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email