IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Sat, 20 July 2013 03:20 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1573221E80B8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.832
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.832 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.630, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ELX8weLbQmxn for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc3-s29.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s29.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.104]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437F511E816E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU403-EAS141 ([65.55.116.72]) by blu0-omc3-s29.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:20:26 -0700
X-TMN: [jrcVlf/sqNfnCLIQmZ+OouVhoXiQVNrR]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU403-EAS1414E644F6FA21102B685FF936C0@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_b9b02ae9-e51c-4c7a-a4d9-644c5e3a5afa_"
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30C833@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUHOZf21aXgQMrdjTV8Fok+fVp-2SuhTra0JGy0Jq=Wi0Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHp8n2mNdNiXCCNUdEvKgAsh_pPn=jNs+56VCg4PMKbUmOGztQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUZMAuDocwZWXn9a+Xj3kkcX0uyRgjDmy-hQxpTDKWj3w@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30CF49@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfmiRsOXL97XDzMRQ_Vvbk9zaDBBvCPxr_=zbDJbnMZ_8A@mail.gmail.com> <E795F35A-B0A5-4BD8-B807-C97B76EC586B@iii.ca> <CAJrXDUHi3Rs4ioWqX4-ACF4crfDJT5Z71pvzzQvW_HqGqUH0VQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFmODfuLvaPJL8niP480fp0BwPBX7nYpQARRAogHOc7uQ@mail.gmail.com> <1CFEEBBF-DD98-4EDA-9595-F4E3ACB8A94F@iii.ca> <CAJrXDUGVjgB3wmoKjdkdsJ7zKi1SFUNWBuj_NUPLbdC0a-2Mcg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUGVjgB3wmoKjdkdsJ7zKi1SFUNWBuj_NUPLbdC0a-2Mcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:20:25 -0700
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jul 2013 03:20:26.0942 (UTC) FILETIME=[1467B5E0:01CE84F8]
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 03:20:32 -0000

You can remove my line in the spreadsheet, but the residue of my bit presence may remain, polluting nearby cells. I recommend use of bit bleach. 

On Jul 19, 2013, at 7:10 PM, "Peter Thatcher" <pthatcher@google.com> wrote:

> Like I said when I first sent the summary, anyone is welcome to make a different summary from the raw data, or collect their own data.  I haven't been around long enough to know how to categorize people and whose input is considered valuable and whose isn't, so I ignorantly gave everyone equal weight.  So if you'd like, you can filter out  Bernard and recalculate.
> 
> 
> On Jul 19, 2013 6:52 PM, "Cullen Jennings" <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote:
>> 
>> On Jul 19, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > You're surprised that the first web developers that try out WebRTC and have feedback have experience with SIP and VoIP?  We shouldn't find that surprising, nor should we discount their feedback because of it.
>> 
>> I was not saying that feedback from folks like Bernard Aboba was not useful, of course it can be. I was just noting the sample set.
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email