Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface
Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> Tue, 09 July 2013 03:03 UTC
Return-Path: <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E514A11E810F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2-oe8oSEkM+m for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x235.google.com (mail-oa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC0311E810E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id k14so7154342oag.26 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 20:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Y5fz5gcx/E7cSFmUMGepsuGxBe8fIVPNy6g20vIFwtI=; b=rKL6mFvduDO49sOhUrE9SYZ3zUKvxWQVllqB/pMxEvf19boX19folYeZrrHPmOjQIR GTvCRa1QyqeoPAfd3ojK3lwGn/MA9uMsfB/6Ne4WYBs/e9ufwxer7hzf4HwqLH9F0T8e 7ru2sAWPPJ0IuohQQ0O2tPVmQCPFwtho1m7jr4YGg+FXgMNzmORZRYbG463eSpXnk9nN CiviCy/fScXd7i3uYHmpawk3HaYrVu6CA6eT1RmB1QPTTfwzhULD8P9BzTJCqyk8zPAx dv/2LppZJrws4LV1JOn5Tq0ggnabtVFJbJkx1IxyQVw2Dq0M8Cw9ERJUV0XBN71r4h9L oLxA==
X-Received: by 10.182.61.46 with SMTP id m14mr22717402obr.58.1373339012170; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 20:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.173.106 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUHOZf21aXgQMrdjTV8Fok+fVp-2SuhTra0JGy0Jq=Wi0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30C833@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUHOZf21aXgQMrdjTV8Fok+fVp-2SuhTra0JGy0Jq=Wi0Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:03:12 +1000
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2mNdNiXCCNUdEvKgAsh_pPn=jNs+56VCg4PMKbUmOGztQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 03:03:35 -0000
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote: > > No objections at all? That is rather surprising to me. I asked for some > feedback the API in the spreadsheet from web developers, at there many > objections from them about this part of the API. A majority did say it was > good enough for simple use cases, but he objections were still clearly > non-zero. > > I think perhaps the web developers are not well represented at TPAC. But I > could be wrong. Perhaps they are but changed their mind. Or maybe they're > objecting on the IETF mailing list when they should object on the IETF > mailing list. Or maybe the spreadsheet has a sample bias, while TPAC is > the true sample. I don't know, but it seems like something is going on, > and I'd like to know what it is. > > Stefan, what do you think? What could explain the apparent contradiction > between objections on the mailing list vs. no objections f2f? I'm not Stefan, but I have a theory. I think there are two groups objecting and there are two things to object against. Here's what I'm reading... Web Developers really just want to be given functionality. They can build their own nice API on top of what browsers implement (jquery did a marvellous job of that). But they want functionality. Seeing as some things are not currently possible with SDP and O/A, they either want to extend those to allow their functionality, or - in particular where SDP & O/A are overkill - want an option to get out of using SDP & O/A and use something else. Telco engineers want their existing devices to be interoperable with browsers as well as the ability to develop new devices in the future with extended functionality. So, on behalf of the first goal, they object to including functionality into SDP that other devices don't already support, and on behalf of the second goal, they are torn between extending SDP & O/A and starting new. As to why you haven't seen anyone object at the TPAC (did you really mean TPAC, btw? The next TPAC meeting is only in November) - maybe none of the people of these two groups were present at last year's TPAC? Or they didn't understand the consequences yet.... Also, it's easy to object on a mailing list, while in a meeting room, you'd have to provide an alternative and it's really hard to come up with such an alternative IMHO. I certainly want a simple API, but I am not sure whether what we currently have is already the simplest possible (given current circumstances), nor am I sure whether it wouldn't just be possible to build a simple one on top the jquery way, which would be sufficient for now. HTH, Silvia.
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Eric Rescorla
- [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opini… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Philipp Hancke
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Binod
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Robin Raymond
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Philipp Hancke
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- [rtcweb] e= lines (Re: Summary of Application Dev… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] e= lines (Re: Summary of Application… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] e= lines (Re: Summary of Application… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] e= lines (Re: Summary of Application… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Summary… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Robin Raymond
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Sum… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' o… Iñaki Baz Castillo