Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface

Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> Tue, 09 July 2013 03:49 UTC

Return-Path: <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF8B11E8110 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BtcvzoGWnJOf for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x230.google.com (mail-oa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA17121F9BB5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id f4so7244212oah.21 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 20:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=phYFJd1HwKLnmCYjgGupzC0Y9REm/zVlJhbus9Rd1Ls=; b=JF/9uSYe68NIPb2NH3S3TybecyOR1IpRkD+NYybKgF4h0bN4SoH8zGkQf4IKJe2pZk gVI5xsj7Nue42lLK4JjwM2+4UPtVXNOASHTHt5CGxsnsVonhkh65d03p9Hvv/jaSncSW hxTWIeZrmVMfF55V4Il/KUm0odBWCqEB8xHOBdgd6N1HEHWZPzaq/M8ZZaL6bwowU89i /yIcvudZVq2Q+xcv+sn7bi2K+5OnuEVfIxEOt5vvL9iUoarsVE4DZYYPfPdwKkTH7lFT /VlHtalBSRU1ohlkGhBeQTZmw9OPb0yHo7Owk+Mpf5vPlxDGjgcS0xUi6HHKs0ao2T8s u0OA==
X-Received: by 10.182.61.46 with SMTP id m14mr22815656obr.58.1373341797068; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 20:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.173.106 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUZMAuDocwZWXn9a+Xj3kkcX0uyRgjDmy-hQxpTDKWj3w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30C833@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUHOZf21aXgQMrdjTV8Fok+fVp-2SuhTra0JGy0Jq=Wi0Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHp8n2mNdNiXCCNUdEvKgAsh_pPn=jNs+56VCg4PMKbUmOGztQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUZMAuDocwZWXn9a+Xj3kkcX0uyRgjDmy-hQxpTDKWj3w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:49:37 +1000
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2k4=Gt=m1LmOUH6YazwAidEd4PH+rVL9igoH74ZGBQf=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 03:49:58 -0000

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>; wrote:
> On 8 July 2013 20:03, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>; wrote:
>> Or they didn't understand the consequences yet.... Also, it's
>> easy to object on a mailing list, while in a meeting room, you'd have
>> to provide an alternative and it's really hard to come up with such an
>> alternative IMHO.
>
> Hey Silvia,
>
> We were there, in person, in Lyon, last November, but there were just
> two of us.  We even had a viable alternative.

Right!

> It's easy to dismiss two people.  Almost as easy, if not even easier,
> to dismiss an absent mass.

Agreed. But I think things are different now that there is so much
more experience so maybe next TPAC will look different.

Cheers,
Silvia.