Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface)

Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> Fri, 19 July 2013 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <pthatcher@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F15121E805D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.597, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SARE_HTML_USL_OBFU=1.666]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M-gMEgDxaKMb for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x233.google.com (mail-pb0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1EC11E80E3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id um15so4686814pbc.24 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=+exL9caBwGmUnE1nX3MWE/4mcq8+2YkO9rvRFdeoDXE=; b=HksWwjNDMwl2Q+DfG8+0Mu4QHokGs5L7/mP9ooMcG6dIIqt0QKfPEgxf4F6oDotvX6 KVJZ2ZuTMTggEtFpjIQIemjOWPScWRVE68Z1La2uCsfbLiOHNxgMOdtUWM7B29rZiyQj 7uWy4UHskMVtvzJDAD7+dICwzzcv0Yg4exZvqGsmt1xdl/ynU5mJqB/DXA4gg3fbmp4D dw+ocrKq7Su9+3DHD89QodiKynkcYyb8S/zDHaYr1zPb210gaZJLlxexMBEE9N8OTol6 1k2VaZqaXotiipZNFYY7EI/eW9boAgx+0TnTII8gOfxboas9/LjWOGAj7OZNo6Oi99WN KYvg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=+exL9caBwGmUnE1nX3MWE/4mcq8+2YkO9rvRFdeoDXE=; b=JCsKzEgZC8i4Om1GKk6Zi4pIFJDQJXv6zaUI1RDQShqYNASBFHnjawBkHvp8CYksp/ g4fCsvRbDSl0Di+WUXlVeK/QnUoQhPuh6Qf2FY1Qx/h1gLquDq0BN5IgR+nQ8i4zUNfr DvWdYWJSYnx9KpbhluxGPd+DylCPvtbaRYpXd0wYGehnmFbX4zSuQtTq+Ay6xOwgBT33 Bx4DKoJ3DcqoXfZkHIRFq8UPX0KQ6vBScMEst4nh1P19ncVakPvHHFghMMOegiko14YJ Bh3DoFLOgP05IlX1cLyE4+RcM8nIypJJ/mM1LnXZsiXFgH37XKeVkOOTbGXvtjkYNMFP PATQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.29.2 with SMTP id f2mr18320541pbh.184.1374255648856; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.78.195 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51E978C2.8000002@nostrum.com>
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30C833@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxvGfkgRp6tXwbOu_kVteHiBBqsyR5ixH18FMKjCNGO8VQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30CD1E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <BLU401-EAS386F88B3FE140492B39B59693610@phx.gbl> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484213E41E7@TK5EX14MBXC265.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <C50FDAD5-492C-4A83-AD6D-464242FB4A05@iii.ca> <CALiegfneUj=kzDjR_E1=S-bqAajaPUE3f_A2g8oGriFyPhamPA@mail.gmail.com> <51E96B5B.2050302@nostrum.com> <CAD5OKxsgSoRg=OcAKLWZpQNzseW5oSHimoa83LHXegZad4i=sA@mail.gmail.com> <51E978C2.8000002@nostrum.com>
From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:39:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUFFQ-Xx5bJWEdH7JR6Ye9zrXKpieO+b=ea7-SD3LpfNWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec520f3b9c820a904e1e0d36e
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmTt+TxDvM5oDeV+RhufuoSb2Ky/vcl9f3qpozKW2DTaf+fvyUsCNbeGmu5omDrN/pw0CAa1X6wDqBnlug0dQ9r9OBupF/pCtTlQQaowqPZNJFmWlNnI+iqvPKBCjlBs9MsgWq4j3JA1ofGaqIgr7yERbzcy3yZPRvPwVuSYESjx3JC3S4ImYu1bDfmeMyfZbjV7bW+
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:40:52 -0000

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>; wrote:

> On 7/19/13 12:29, Roman Shpount wrote:
>
>> First of all, a lot of the issues you are talking about are not yet
>> solved.
>>
>
> That was my *point*.
>
>
So, are you trying to say "Look how hard this is to do with SDP.  We're not
even done yet.  It will be even harder without SDP"?


>  /a
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/rtcweb<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>
>