Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs) (UNCLASSIFIED)

Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com> Thu, 17 January 2013 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@phonefromhere.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B40521F85EA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 06:48:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.322
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.322 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.277, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z6uCFkdUDdmq for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 06:48:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp003.apm-internet.net (smtp003.apm-internet.net [85.119.248.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC2621F8613 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 06:48:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 76899 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2013 14:48:00 -0000
X-AV-Scan: clean
Received: from unknown (HELO zimbra003.verygoodemail.com) (85.119.248.218) by smtp003.apm-internet.net with SMTP; 17 Jan 2013 14:48:00 -0000
Received: from [192.67.4.33] (unknown [192.67.4.33]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8E7F18A0A72; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:48:00 +0000 (GMT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com>
In-Reply-To: <18441_1358433678_50F80D8E_18441_583_1_2842AD9A45C83B44B57635FD4831E60A075F80@PEXCVZYM14.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:48:00 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7F17D6EC-A402-4D5B-B323-9BF04843F1F9@phonefromhere.com>
References: <8486C8728176924BAF5BDB2F7D7EEDDF4907E630@ucolhp9l.easf.csd.disa.mil> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD2338CF2A76@XMB104ADS.rim.net> <7CBFD4609D19C043A4AC4FD8381C6E26023CF7B3@DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net> <50F80846.5030300@nostrum.com> <7CBFD4609D19C043A4AC4FD8381C6E26023CF832@DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net> <C15DBD56-8014-42B7-8A07-68DB13AB81E2@phonefromhere.com> <18441_1358433678_50F80D8E_18441_583_1_2842AD9A45C83B44B57635FD4831E60A075F80@PEXCVZYM14.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
To: stephane.proust@orange.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs) (UNCLASSIFIED)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:48:03 -0000

On 17 Jan 2013, at 14:41, <stephane.proust@orange.com> wrote:

>> AMR-WB is 'future legacy' ;-)
> 
> It seems we already live in the future: Currently HD voice with AMR-WB is launched in more than 50 mobile networks all over the world (more than 35 countries) with more than 130 WB-AMR enabled mobile devices
> 
> Probably at present time a little bit more AMR-WB codecs deployed than OPUS codecs.
> 
> Just check on the GSA Web site
> 
> http://www.gsacom.com/news/gsa_358.php

At the risk of worsening the rat hole, I will bet you that more wideband minutes are carried over opus on Mumble
than AMR-WB over the entire GSMA. 

I'll also bet that there are more chrome users (with opus enabled) than Gsm handsets with AMR-WB enabled.

T.