IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs)

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Mon, 14 January 2013 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3E221F88C7 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:00:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.481
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.481 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.495, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ohwHcrDBImiU for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:00:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB62A21F88BE for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:00:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hj13so1467940wib.7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:00:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=KUWoTsBtpvfsKqUFb4cCXadsgtqEt11meq7kxBlHQIo=; b=QDYLmmedHV6dnpGRs4AhnLN2QTDyollMMZXgo/54o2shra4qzLjCUQbCoNGCcUZGoy pmaMn+ansUR9QbbB+iI26EHLjq2RvnK4+FvgHBprOxbXePhbWeDDSXz3CjErBEzQWmjT BX8ne/EPNXSsFDJ9uK7VVPH/uw73n8LkfbZQFFmyu4m18zu8G+aKPUuU3idrLwtP8mns TurUyXau0/y8QJqi6MyJ6CFlvCfACz1Mtj6RXCIbf2RldkPeUo2xKG5txsU4/TxLzAMx ZsvxuKgiaD4FbWdsdkiQU1Ksuo2y/c4fsv5Ur3OOIbUvbtePAYUDuD+TYNp3bOJcuTgL 7uAg==
X-Received: by 10.194.240.129 with SMTP id wa1mr44130875wjc.21.1358186457675; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:00:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hg17sm13816352wib.1.2013.01.14.10.00.55 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:00:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id o1so1471318wic.11 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:00:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.80.73 with SMTP id p9mr36169875wjx.4.1358186455087; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:00:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.16.134 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:00:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <50F43ACA.80206@nostrum.com>
References: <50D2CC6A.4090500@ericsson.com> <6515_1357907583_50F0067F_6515_1738_1_2842AD9A45C83B44B57635FD4831E60A0747CC@PEXCVZYM14.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <BLU0-SMTP880A602A311CE05C9DC39FD0290@phx.gbl> <A26C56D5-C501-4823-8099-62AF7910B8A4@ntt-at.com> <580BEA5E3B99744AB1F5BFF5E9A3C67D16813E56EC@HE111648.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <50F41D97.1030508@nostrum.com> <CAD5OKxtsWMfAV=K4sM+zLXoyVCgihwujH2gG9ziA5GuEtsU0sQ@mail.gmail.com> <50F43ACA.80206@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:00:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxug2qB+Xi_cp87Lt7BiPwJ1Eq1rNuioj+zDZFf=RRckPw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bb04dae31ba9804d3436d2d"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlN5Bm7GWOzE5q/GAILo6X7vbJnEGI4xA6xMBMyysaNbAk4DOykTYPGRSiFLOwsAlXLpdSw
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:00:59 -0000

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> What has been directly posed is the following form: given the RFC 2119
> definition of "SHOULD" below, do you earnestly believe that support of
> G.722 actually warrants this level of specification:


I actually believe that G.722 warrants an RFC 2119 MUST, but this was voted
against with the main reason (at least from my point of view) being desire
to promote OPUS. I do agree that webrtc should express its preference for
OPUS, but I do not see what valid reasons or circumstances can exist that
will prevent G.722 implementation. I think that interoperability is a valid
enough reason that G.722 support should be required.

_____________
Roman Shpount

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email