Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 08 July 2013 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A7A21F9DAA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.676
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.676 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_74=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P38DEmed0J-c for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f173.google.com (mail-qc0-f173.google.com [209.85.216.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF4D21F99B7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:42:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id l10so2419145qcy.18 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 09:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=VyXZSdwk1lypm3CsiQboZFfnrr70TNVSXYJQcQYufDE=; b=WzTQy64mumIuOxnCqxTzWrZ8kwJGXtpRUU2XkHqEZYR30W6NvGG8ow2ubSulpAxNQn e5STUM6+4iC+ho5AmaG7Qe3NrveTWfZgZez1npHFa8P0+kpwa1UOHnVaUVVxuD/Ok/VY 6YR9TcCFMyrkUEOWgVTsxMutJV8Ajisxjrw7qH8FWh0dLIRtvgvcpVFOTBVa/Xc2HA5z MUuz+vzzyBy8eYql8Phgf4e2L0qON8lJLub+m8NrpLirSjZbthYb2LCAmIiuY4Utue8n 9HZnkCyxG4TYFf7UbAfif4Z0pvlx+oaDtN4uoMNriHJdNFR0QCSWyDBIVwNN4IxcpF3y jLpw==
X-Received: by 10.49.116.9 with SMTP id js9mr17222567qeb.73.1373301717912; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 09:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.48.234 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [63.245.219.150]
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxutv8x2Y40+JXQgbCLXd9N_KaW4ca95izMp5=xsNuG6Yg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30C833@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxvGfkgRp6tXwbOu_kVteHiBBqsyR5ixH18FMKjCNGO8VQ@mail.gmail.com> <57A15FAF9E58F841B2B1651FFE16D281057BD4@GENSJZMBX01.msg.int.genesyslab.com> <CAD5OKxuBmZxvDXD2Doc-7HH2sSK2neZH7v-W2XS_R+RTBkwveA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMVC1kJJubunTsy_wgS=AjZjCiajvbjMYpLmihVp+U2Dg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxutv8x2Y40+JXQgbCLXd9N_KaW4ca95izMp5=xsNuG6Yg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:41:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNy+6cfoEGKjPD-9wk2B-B=SfYzBBi54sR0FDzqqGDbLg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6da78210e1b204e102b9af
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQksgSunGyE+gNsSNBjKIRk7Ci0IUct3Q++LH+DoTQ6I2lKeLiN1nXZy2cWHOnus9CB2josd
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:42:50 -0000

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>; wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>; wrote:
>
>> Yes, this matches my understanding as well. However, I believe there was
>> also
>> general agreement that most things one would want to do should be
>> doable without modifying SDP.
>>
>
>
> "Should be doable" being the operative word. We are not there yet. We need
> both new API types (like capabilites) and more settings for existing API
> methods(more constraints).
>

Yes, I agree with that. What would be useful would be for people to
make a list of these use cases and the extensions which would
enable them.

-Ekr